Tag Implication: mouth_pull -> mouth

Implicating mouth_pull -> mouth.

Reason: The latter, I imagine, is for when something interesting is happen. The former counts.

Can a mouth pull be done from behind, such that only the cheeks are visible? </advocate>

I would still say no to implicating, since mouth posts have an overwhelming focus on mouths (post #668688, post #993583), or mouths where they don't belong/nightmare mouths.

Hillside_Moose said:
I would still say no to implicating, since mouth posts have an overwhelming focus on mouths (post #668688, post #993583), or mouths where they don't belong/nightmare mouths.

I still say its vague enough that it can apply in this case as well.

It's vague if you only look at the wiki/tag name and never bother to look at the tag. I would hate for this tag to end up like legs, diluted to hell because of people that don't know any better.

There's also the matter T5J8F8 brought up.

Like Hillside Moose says few of these posts deserve the mouth tag.

Passing on an implication here.