create implication horseback_riding -> horse
also horseback_riding -> riding
Posted under Tags
create implication horseback_riding -> horse
also horseback_riding -> riding
Ixendr said:
create implication horseback_riding -> horse
I don't think seahorses (post #1602838) and unicorns (post #1582372) count as horses.
Should posts like these actually count as horseback_riding? There are currently a number of them under the tag, but maybe just riding would be sufficient. But if they do qualify for horseback_riding, then it shouldn't implicate horse.
I don't think seahorses should qualify as horseback_riding in my opinion.
Toks said:
I don't think seahorses (post #1602838) and unicorns (post #1582372) count as horses.
Should posts like these actually count as horseback_riding? There are currently a number of them under the tag, but maybe just riding would be sufficient. But if they do qualify for horseback_riding, then it shouldn't implicate horse.
Seahorses - that's a tag exploitation I think. :D
Unicorns, Pegasi etc. - hmm, good point.
What about donkeys? I think they also should be tagged just riding (currently all are).