Tag implication: broken_plate -> plate

create implication broken_plate -> plate

Link to implication

redblueandgray said:

create implication broken_plate -> plate

Link to implication

Should plate still be tagged if it's broken into many tiny pieces lying all around the floor? This warrants broken_plate but not plate, I think.

Is that still a plate when the plate doesn't exist anymore?
post #1891091
I think it's quite hard to tag this as a plate.
(Besides it has only 30 images, so I doubt this will get through anyway.)

I wouldn't call a broken plate a plate any more than I'd call rubble a building. It isn't the thing it once was.

On a related note, broken armor and broken weapon imply armor and weapon, but those implications are a legacy of jxh's tenure and don't have any related forum topics. I don't think any of the current administrators would make such implications without some discussion first.

With this: We have also a huge ton of torn_* tags which imply the attir, like skirt, shirt etc.
Basically, that's the same: Broken skirt = Torn skirt.

The tag implication broken_plate -> plate has been rejected.

So that's a "No", I guess. As for discussion on whether other broken_*/torn_* tags should imply the object itself, create a new topic so others would notice it properly.