Danbooru

Flag Vandalism

Posted under General

Blank_User said:

You omitted the "Anatomy check" part, which is a valid reason for flagging. I don't see anything wrong with the face, though.

I actually agree with the flagger that the face looks a little uncanny, though I dunno if that's really enough to delete it. Not really up to me.

ElephantLover said:

Hi, a few posts I've uploaded have been approved but people/or perhaps one person has been flagging them over the last few days for the reason of "quality check"
I know it's horse fetish stuff, but is this valid? I just feel like QC means they don't like this type of content instead of something being wrong with the posts that were already approved.

post #7633985
post #7633753
post #7637087
post #7634092
post #7634150

Unfortunately, by their very nature it's impossible to know for sure if "quality check" flags were made because the flagger actually thought the post's quality was lacking, or because they just didn't like the post on a personal level. As such, unless the post in question is completely fine, we have to give the flagger the benefit of the doubt and assume the former.

However, in the case of your posts, the flagger likely was concerned about the quality. The linework and shading are somewhat simplistic and amateurish, especially in the more extreme posts like post #7637087. Posts are generally held to a higher level of scrutiny when inflated proportions or extreme fetishes are involved, which is also likely why post #7634092's parent post was left unflagged.

AngryZapdos said:

Unfortunately, by their very nature it's impossible to know for sure if "quality check" flags were made because the flagger actually thought the post's quality was lacking, or because they just didn't like the post on a personal level. As such, unless the post in question is completely fine, we have to give the flagger the benefit of the doubt and assume the former.

However, in the case of your posts, the flagger likely was concerned about the quality. The linework and shading are somewhat simplistic and amateurish, especially in the more extreme posts like post #7637087. Posts are generally held to a higher level of scrutiny when inflated proportions or extreme fetishes are involved, which is also likely why post #7634092's parent post was left unflagged.

That makes sense. Thanks!

1 56 57 58 59 60 61