[REJECTED] Tag implication: grin -> teeth

create implication grin -> teeth

Link to implication

"A broad smile that exposes the teeth."

The tag implication grin -> teeth has been rejected.

Two potential issues:

Should the teeth tag be used where the teeth are represented by a featureless solid white block filling the mouth as in post #2604674 and so many others?

Also, if the teeth are hidden behind, say, a mouth guard but would be visible were this cover not present, then can it still count as a grin?

-1

The teeth wiki:
Use this tag when the teeth are prominent.

There are plenty of grins under the tag in which the teeth are barely a white sliver on the face.

It's worth pointing out that there's dilution of the teeth tag with images where the teeth aren't prominent as a result of the implication from round teeth and clenched teeth. Even in the case of clenched teeth, though, you almost invariably at least get a (sometimes partial) line between top and bottom teeth, which isn't the case with grin.

The tag implication grin -> teeth has been rejected.

As pointed out, there are images of grins in which using the teeth tag wouldn't be warranted.