Arknights skin implications?

BUR #6818 has been approved by @evazion.

create implication ash_(ranger)_(rainbow_six_siege) -> ash_(rainbow_six_siege)
create implication tachanka_(lord)_(rainbow_six_siege) -> tachanka_(rainbow_six_siege)

If we're doing this we should be thorough. These are Arknights skins from the Rainbow Six Siege collaboration event, they were missed in the original BUR because they don't end with *_(arknights). If people expect every Arknights skin to imply its base char tag, they will expect that from these as well.

Ash's skin is called Ranger, not Rangers; while a minor difference, that should be corrected first.

Damian0358 said:

Ash's skin is called Ranger, not Rangers; while a minor difference, that should be corrected first.

I double-checked in game and that's correct. I've corrected the old tag and edited the BUR

The bulk update request #6818 (forum #194737) has been approved by @evazion.

BUR #6874 has been approved by @nonamethanks.

create implication female_doctor_(arknights) -> doctor_(arknights)
create implication male_doctor_(arknights) -> doctor_(arknights)

Not skins, strictly speaking, but since we're doing implications we should include these.

The bulk update request #6874 (forum #195068) has been approved by @nonamethanks.