Bandaids

The bulk update request #8922 has been approved by @nonamethanks.

create implication bandaid_on_nose -> bandaid_on_face
create implication bandaid_on_cheek -> bandaid_on_face
create implication bandaid_on_forehead -> bandaid_on_face
create implication bandaid_on_knee -> bandaid_on_leg

Goes without saying that putting bandaids on those places necessitates putting bandaids on the face (or leg, in the case of a knee bandaid) in the first place.

There is only currently a small amount of overlap between posts tagged bandaid_on_knee and bandaid_on_leg. The addition of knee depictions will outnumber non-knee depictions by 2 to 1 once the implication is made, so it might be worth considering having tags for bandaids on the thigh and bandaids on the lower leg.

For the same reason we didn't imply scar_across_eye to scar_on_face, we also can't imply bandaid_on_nose to bandaid_on_face. There's always the potential for extra_noses to have bandaids on them, or even stuff like the disembodied sentient nose from the newest Warioware game.

That being said, I wouldn't mind making seperate tags for these fringe cases rather than letting them get in the way of obvious implications like this.

The only post where scar across eye applies but scar on face doesn't (that I could find) is post #2664766. I agree that it's a bit absurd for us to not be able to have these implications, because the same argument could be made about any facial feature. We'd have to unimply scar on mouth and scar on nose for the same reason, because plenty of weird cases exist like extra_noses and extra mouth and chest mouth.

The bulk update request #8922 (forum #205768) has been approved by @nonamethanks.