The bulk update request #8946 has been rejected.
create implication jack-o'_challenge -> top-down_bottom-up
The wiki page for the challenge says it's an extreme top-down bottom-up pose, so an implication for that only makes sense.
Posted under Tags
The bulk update request #8946 has been rejected.
create implication jack-o'_challenge -> top-down_bottom-up
The wiki page for the challenge says it's an extreme top-down bottom-up pose, so an implication for that only makes sense.
Usually we don't do cross-category implications like this because there are always parodies or some other case that is an exception to the rule. Here are some of the counter-examples you can find by searching jack-o'_challenge -top-down_bottom-up:
The concept of the pose yes, but there is a good number posts where top-down_bottom-up doesn't apply:
post #4735198 - character attempting the pose
post #4753147 - character attempting the pose
post #4745625 - character attempting the pose (questionable if top-down_bottom-up really applies)
post #4744881 - character that tried the pose but gave up
post #4762247 - invisible character doing the pose, can't really see a top-down_bottom-up
post #4762480 (and parent) - looks like top-down_bottom-up at first but it isn't actually
post #4962507 - parody of the pose, inverted
post #4760083 - zombie character referencing the pose but it isn't exactly top-down_bottom-up
There's also posts featuring non-human beings referencing the pose
post #5121827
post #4749713
post #4833399
The bulk update request #8946 (forum #205922) has been rejected by @nonamethanks.