Danbooru

AI-generated art check thread

Posted under General

Eurekaaaaaa said:

batiao zhai's works are very likely to be ai-assisted due to a lot of inconsistent in style

post #7570818 - mochirong's style
post #7553557 - modare's style
https://twitter.com/elgg112/status/1789292768713638338 - yd_(orange_maru)'s style?

I’m more inclined to think that the first two are pretty much AI-generated with minor things painted over. Both have upscaled JPEG artifacts and AI-strangeness such as the collar’s buckle, janky leash, and one eye’s iris following the hair’s contour. The third one looks like it has some really badly painted over areas, such as the neck ribbon and the belt buckle thing on her chest.

Pretty sure udonurahara's work has an ai-assisted base, due to the specific eyes, off model faces and especially the wonky proportions in perspective.
Can't see any definitive proof, but it just looks like it instantly to me. They do a pretty good job of making clean image sets from it afterwards, so they're definitely not directly generated.

post #7024862 - I'm not familiar with the models, but one of the 'default' ones produces belly shading exactly like that. Overall the image looks AI-generated from the thumbnail, but at full resolution nothing else about it stands out as an artifact of that. So I wonder if the artist drew over an AI-generation to the point that they ultimately left nothing of the original generation in the final image.

https://aiai222.lofter.com isn't AI, despite the name, right? I checked her Weibo album and everything looks like a consistent artstyle that has progressed to its current level even before AI. But the name makes me nervous, so I thought I'd double-check here, before uploading and having to create an artist tag that could be taken as a red flag.

Edit: Turned out to be the (dead) Lofter account of Qingshui Ai, who's Lofter name is a pun on things. Definitely a false alarm, and my own overthinking getting the better of me.

Updated

1 80 81 82 83 84 85