Posted under Tags
Given that Nai_Diffusion and Stable_Diffusion are AI, if we ban them, we may discourage some users of uploading ai-generated pictures, simply because they'll make the link between AI-generated pictures and the restriction on upping them.
(same applies for the other kinds of ...-diffusion artist tags)
Don't banned artist posts just lead to a "takedown" notice page as of now? It'd probably cause more confusion than anything in the tag's current state.
I don't think it makes any more sense then than it does now. However, in light of post #5751545 and discussion in the AI check thread, I propose an alternative: Apply a banned_artist equivalent to artist tags that purely use AI-generation, as an additional sanity check. It'd help mostly with the ones that don't say they use it unlike this example.
The banned artist tag isn't meant for this purpose. Instead they could imply AI-generated (unless these tags count for AI-assisted works too).
Oh well, they're now meta tags, which is much better (even though @g6672D 's idea is interesting, as also the implication to AI-generated for "artists" doing art solely with AI :blobthinkingeyes: )
