Posted under General
Is the nitocris_alter_(neferu_suen_anubis)_(fate) tag really a distinction that needs to have its own tag?
I appreciate the need to have visually distinct forms/costumes/ascensions/whatever else with their own tags, but this feels like somewhat of an overkill distinction, no? It's just nitocris_alter_(second_ascension)_(fate) + nude with magical censorship flames.
Such as how post #6057779 is neferu suen anubis and its child post #6063208 is second ascension...
BUR #15193 has been approved by @evazion.
create alias nitocris_alter_(neferu_suen_anubis)_(fate) -> nitocris_alter_(second_ascension)_(fate)
Putting this up as an alias to see what people think. It's good to have tags for visually distinct forms (even if Fate is particularly overkill...), but imo having a specific tag for the-same-form-but-naked-with-fire-censor is starting to introduce a bit too much granularity to tags and this is just as easily findable by searching nitocris_alter_(second_ascension)_(fate) + nude instead. Of course if people think it's visually distinct enough to have its own tag, then that's fine too.
Astolfo said:
BUR #15193 has been approved by @evazion.
create alias nitocris_alter_(neferu_suen_anubis)_(fate) -> nitocris_alter_(second_ascension)_(fate)
Of course if people think it's visually distinct enough to have its own tag, then that's fine too.
The noble phantasm could have it's own tag, like other NPs do. A search of nitocris alter + neferu suen anubis, or just the latter, can bring to specifically those artworks.
The bulk update request #15193 (forum #233439) has been approved by @evazion.
