for post #6070757 , one of the comment is pointing out a lot of stuff that indicates a majority of the image is untouched AI, it made me take a closer look at the image and i've noticed that the entire hoodie is what it looks like when AI tries to emulate visible brush strokes, only the outlines of the hoodie and that red thingy on it seem to possibly have been painted over, everything about the background indicates it is AI with no paintover except for whatever the wooden furniture on the right is, we dont know what her left hand is supposed to be holding.
weird clipping in the hair, most notably where it joins the hoodie, and the hairclips that look much more hand drawn than what's around it,
same for the right hand which looks entirely drawn, very visibly so, compared to it's surroundings, and even more compared to the general rendering of the image.
the lacey decorations on the bra also look AI and nothing like something from an artist's process
and finally there's a weird little nonsensical line of separation of shade on her left inner thigh that is
adding all that has been pointed out in the comments of the post, it really does convince me that at least for this specific image, very little was manually done, and vast majority of what we see was purely AI. 10% of manual painting/drawing at best