Missing implication glowing_petals

Posted under Tags

BUR #16820 has been approved by @nonamethanks.

create implication glowing_petals -> petals
create implication glowing_petals -> glowing

Seems to me like a pretty straightforward implication. I've quickly submitted a wiki based on a quick scroll through the tagged posts, doesn't seem to show any evident exceptions to tagging both. Usage is inline with falling_petals 95% of the time I'd even say, can't find instances where they're not falling or carried by the wind in some way.

Updated by skb044

1