BUR #17087 has been rejected.
rename takt_op._destiny -> takt:_op._(series)
Takt op. Destiny is the anime title, the series is simply takt op.
Posted under Tags
BUR #17087 has been rejected.
rename takt_op._destiny -> takt:_op._(series)
Takt op. Destiny is the anime title, the series is simply takt op.
BUR #17104 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
rename takt_op._destiny -> takt_op.
Should just be this (no qualifier), or even with no period
Updated by LQ
LQ said:
BUR #17104 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
rename takt_op._destiny -> takt_op.
Should just be this, or even with no period
The series is stylized "takt: op." though? Also op. is short for "opus" so you'd want to keep that period.
Updated by magcolo
Eh, we don't stylize the idolmaster as the idolm@ster.
I think the second BUR is the best option (period but no colon); there doesn't seem to be enough support for the Wikipedia article title omitting the period, whereas all the JP official sites and EN aggregates have it as "Takt Op.".
Updated by LQ
The bulk update request #17087 (forum #242519) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.
The bulk update request #17104 (forum #242573) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.
The bulk update request #17105 (forum #242574) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.
magcolo said:
Can we give this a second look?
magcolo said:
Of course, destiny is only a branch of the series, not the main title. It's like making fate stay night the umbrella tag for every fate post.
You said it yourself, it's a branch of the series. That invalidates these BURs, unless there's no difference between the anime and the game.
nonamethanks said:
You said it yourself, it's a branch of the series. That invalidates these BURs, unless there's no difference between the anime and the game.
What I meant was that Destiny is a brach of the series, so we need to rename it to Takt op. so the Symphony posts can stay. The current takt op. destiny tag we have is used for all Takt posts (and its wiki proves it), so I was trying to change it to the general term, that's why it's a rename not an alias. Wether we need sub tags can be discussed later.
BUR #18943 has been rejected.
mass update takt_op._destiny -> copy:takt_op.
create implication takt_op._destiny -> takt_op.
Ok, that makes more sense. Then what really should happen here is that the parent tag is created so that the child tag can be cleaned up.
