Danbooru

Nuking hyper-specific accesory tags

Posted under Tags

I think because the hexagon and wave are simple-enough shapes, they should be kept as-is no matter what. As for the others, I feel deleting them entirely is too much. I'd rather establish a new tag to summarise them all as, for example, Object_Themed_Hair_Ornament, with them maybe just implying it for now. This would bring it in line with food-themed_hair_ornament
we have a lot of hair ornament tags. nuking a few specific ones because they're not used by many characters yet feels a bit counter-intuitive. Especially Deprecating them entirely.

Updated

BUR #18549 has been rejected.

create implication monocle_hair_ornament -> object-themed_hair_ornament
create implication anchor_hair_ornament -> object-themed_hair_ornament
create implication saddle_hair_ornament -> object-themed_hair_ornament
create implication test_tube_hair_ornament -> object-themed_hair_ornament
create implication sword_hair_ornament -> object-themed_hair_ornament
create implication soccer_ball_hair_ornament -> object-themed_hair_ornament
create implication disco_ball_hair_ornament -> object-themed_hair_ornament
create implication poke_ball_hair_ornament -> object-themed_hair_ornament
create implication spike_ball_hair_ornament -> object-themed_hair_ornament
create implication shield_hair_ornament -> object-themed_hair_ornament

Following up on my previous post. I feel creating a useful tag out of these tags considered useless makes more sense than nuking them entirely.

This would bring them in line with food-themed_hair_ornament, be flexible to a variety of situations, and if they are later deprecated and removed, this can be changed to an alias. But some of these (particularly anchor_hair_ornament) are big enough that they shouldn't be deprecated regardless.

C-light said:

BUR #18549 has been rejected.

create implication monocle_hair_ornament -> object-themed_hair_ornament
create implication anchor_hair_ornament -> object-themed_hair_ornament
create implication saddle_hair_ornament -> object-themed_hair_ornament
create implication test_tube_hair_ornament -> object-themed_hair_ornament
create implication sword_hair_ornament -> object-themed_hair_ornament
create implication soccer_ball_hair_ornament -> object-themed_hair_ornament
create implication disco_ball_hair_ornament -> object-themed_hair_ornament
create implication poke_ball_hair_ornament -> object-themed_hair_ornament
create implication spike_ball_hair_ornament -> object-themed_hair_ornament
create implication shield_hair_ornament -> object-themed_hair_ornament

Following up on my previous post. I feel creating a useful tag out of these tags considered useless makes more sense than nuking them entirely.

This would bring them in line with food-themed_hair_ornament, be flexible to a variety of situations, and if they are later deprecated and removed, this can be changed to an alias. But some of these (particularly anchor_hair_ornament) are big enough that they shouldn't be deprecated regardless.

If animal-themed_hair_ornament was considered too broad to group together this definitely is.

zetsubousensei said:

If animal-themed_hair_ornament was considered too broad to group together this definitely is.

I think the critical difference in my eyes at least is that a lot of these are much more niche than animal cases are. A lot of these additional ones I've highlighted have less than 100 tags (the only one that was in AngryZapdos' set, and not mine, with >100 tags is anchor_hair_ornament. Meanwhile, some animal hair ornaments (frog and butterfly) have more tags individually than all food-themed ornaments combined.

Having a tag for man-made object-themed hair ornaments feels like a good way to surface a bunch of niche hair ornament designs in one tag.

I made my point in discord, but I'll repeat it here because I don't like this kind of discussion being lost for people not present at the exact time something important happens.

1. I think we should be striving for more tag specificity and move away from oldbooru-style broad category tags that apply to hundreds of thousands of posts (or a million of tags in the case of hair ornament).

2. Nuking a tag because only a couple of characters dominate it at the moment is very dumb and short-sighted argument and not only is akin to nuking any of the touhou character-specific ornaments back during touhou domination or stuff any of the waifu-of-the-month-of-the-gacha-of-the-year specific tags that turn out to be more common down the lane.

3. This kind of thinking is dumb and short-sighted and it is a the source of many of the problems that we keep stumbling into time and time again
and that as others pointed in discord it leads to a tag being nuked because "is just tag padding and that only applies to a single character and is just an alias search for that character", then a second character pops up and we still don't tag it because we have arbitrarily decided that 2 characters is not enough and then a third character comes out and then no one wants to garden it because by that time it's several thousands of posts that no one wants to sit through, so having a tag that can be considered padding seemingly applies to a 1 or 2 characters as of now is the lesser of 2 evils.

4. I believe this BUR is quite biased and came out of your personal distaste for vtubers and their fans/uploaders/taggers, you can keep denying it and calling ad hominem all you want, but the only reason you bring up monocle hair ornament is because of watson amelia and you didn't notice more egregious examples like snake hair ornament being 98.12% kochiya sanae with only 294 out of the 15671 being other characters (with 58 out of the remaining posts being nagatsuki posts coming from a single pool) until I brought it up, and you wouldn't be making such a fuzz out of character-specific tags if it wasn't more associated with vtuber tagging.

It is not tag padding, but exactly why tags exist. And if it is only relevant to a singular character, then so be it, because the tags still have utility for people that seek to use it to search for alternate designs of the characters. Why remove utility for no reason other than lowering the number of tags a post has? The problem of those tags not being used for other posts is more rooted in most taggers not being aware of the existence of these tags and the existence of few character designs that have these design choices.

Mexiguy said:

1. I think we should be striving for more tag specificity and move away from oldbooru-style broad category tags that apply to hundreds of thousands of posts (or a million of tags in the case of hair ornament).

Tag specificity is fine. This is a disingenuous takeaway from my BUR; I'm not arguing that the only tag we should use for hair ornaments is hair ornament, just that extremely specific accessory tags like these serve no purpose beyond tag padding. For example, apple hair ornament is perfectly fine, but a hypothetical toad in the hole hair ornament would likely only ever apply to the one character it was designed for.

2. Nuking a tag because only a couple of characters dominate it at the moment is very dumb and short-sighted argument and not only is akin to nuking any of the touhou character-specific ornaments back during touhou domination or stuff any of the waifu-of-the-month-of-the-gacha-of-the-year specific tags that turn out to be more common down the lane.

3. This kind of thinking is dumb and short-sighted and it is a the source of many of the problems that we keep stumbling into time and time again
and that as others pointed in discord it leads to a tag being nuked because "is just tag padding and that only applies to a single character and is just an alias search for that character", then a second character pops up and we still don't tag it because we have arbitrarily decided that 2 characters is not enough and then a third character comes out and then no one wants to garden it because by that time it's several thousands of posts that no one wants to sit through, so having a tag that can be considered padding seemingly applies to a 1 or 2 characters as of now is the lesser of 2 evils.

In the Discord server, the example tag you specifically brought up was the tokin hat, which is completely different. Tokins are historical articles of clothing that have existed for centuries before Zun was even born. While a majority of tokin hat is Touhou because of a certain popular character's design, it's completely reasonable to expect non-Touhou content to also include tokins.

The monocle hair ornament, however, is something that was introduced to the world at the same time as the one character that wears it, and that's not a coincidence - it's not generic, it's not common; it's extremely specific to the point that the only other post brought up in this thread is just a second example of the exact same situation (and looking at it, it actually seems more like a case of eyewear on head rather than a hair ornament). For decades, this object simply didn't exist, and when Watson Amelia fades into obscurity it's quite likely we will never see it again. What we then end up with is a junk tag, which is quite literally just a search for watson_amelia hair_ornament.

The "what about when another popular character comes out with this kind of hair ornament" argument is a good argument - for the more widespread and popular shapes/designs for hair ornaments. I would bet real money that in the next year we get at least one new character who's decently popular that sports a star hair ornament. However, I would bet even more real money that in the next decade we don't get even a single character, popular or otherwise, wearing a traffic cone hair ornament, or an oboe hair ornament, or a computer tower hair ornament. And this doesn't stop at just hair ornaments - this concept expands tenfold to all kinds of accessories, even to prints. I would fight just as vehemently against taco belt buckle, coffee pot earrings, worm shoelaces, or (god forbid) corrugated galvanised iron sheet print. If we encourage such tagging, we will look back in ten years and find hundreds of these garbage accessory tags with literally no overlap outside of a single character.

4. I believe this BUR is quite biased and came out of your personal distaste for vtubers and their fans/uploaders/taggers, you can keep denying it and calling ad hominem all you want, but the only reason you bring up monocle hair ornament is because of watson amelia and you didn't notice more egregious examples like snake hair ornament being 98.12% kochiya sanae with only 294 out of the 15671 being other characters (with 58 out of the remaining posts being nagatsuki posts coming from a single pool) until I brought it up, and you wouldn't be making such a fuzz out of character-specific tags if it wasn't more associated with vtuber tagging.

I know it might be hard for you to believe this, but I don't actually despise vtubers with every fibre of my being. I just find them sort of annoying, and I enjoy being melodramatic about mundane things. But even if I did, even if the only reason I bothered to make this topic at all was because I froth at the mouth thinking about those accursed deadbeats and karakoe nights with the shark, it wouldn't matter even a tiny little bit. It doesn't matter who makes the BUR, as long as it's a good BUR.

Now, let's address the examples you bring up of snake hair ornament and frog hair ornament (and the accusations of me ignoring them on purpose). I was recently made aware of monocle hair ornament in the Discord server and, seeing the writing on the wall, asked if there were any other similar accessory tags that applied to literally just one character. What you see in the above BUR are all such tags that were brought to my attention at the time. I was certain there'd be more, which is why I asked in the BUR that includes more than one non-vtuber accessory for other users to please list any they were aware of.

I know this isn't going to do me any favors in regards to the vtuber bias you believe me to be under the spell of, but I actually don't have a problem with snake hair ornament and frog hair ornament. The three most common kinds of hair ornaments seems to be simple shapes, animals and food - meanwhile, as far as snakes and frogs go, they fall into the "preschool animal" category, being commonly used to teach children the alphabet. Being the incredibly basic and widely known animals that they are, it's no surprise that we already have hundreds of hair ornament posts for both of them that have nothing at all to do with Touhou. Again, my issue with these hyper-specific accessory tags isn't when one character dominates the results for them. If you can exclude that outlier from the search and find many valid results, then the tag is more than fine. However, when the entire tag consists ONLY of said outlier, then it doesn't actually do anything at all.

uohuo said:

It is not tag padding, but exactly why tags exist. And if it is only relevant to a singular character, then so be it, because the tags still have utility for people that seek to use it to search for alternate designs of the characters. Why remove utility for no reason other than lowering the number of tags a post has? The problem of those tags not being used for other posts is more rooted in most taggers not being aware of the existence of these tags and the existence of few character designs that have these design choices.

We tag Vtuber outfits now, so there's no reason to keep a gentag that only applies to them just so that people can use it to do exactly what the hundreds of outfit tags were made specifically to do. Even for characters that don't have the luxury of having a tag for every outfit they've ever worn, there are certainly better ways to search for or exclude a particular design than using a random extraneous accessory that's probably just going to give an unnacceptable amount of false positives or false negatives.

On top of that, if you're going to claim that the only reason these tags aren't being used on other characters is that they're just unknown and undertagged, I think you should have some examples to back it up.

blindVigil said:

On top of that, if you're going to claim that the only reason these tags aren't being used on other characters is that they're just unknown and undertagged, I think you should have some examples to back it up.

Probably lee-enfield_(girls'_frontline) with this post #5021790 design.

Just adding two things: Removing "monocle hair ornament" AND deprecating it will result in never being able to search for it in the future, even if there are images of minor character, other than Amelia Watson, wearing it. There is no alternate way to search for it. monocle hair_ornament doesn't work of course. (Not accounting for the BUR above)

Second: Removing Monocle hair ornament will result in probably not being able to search for alternate hair ornaments on Amelia Watson, that are no whole design. For example post #4271044. You can solve this problem by accordingly adding alternate hair ornament, which is a real undertagged tag (just like no hair ornament). The count for such cases seems to be pretty low and most alternate hair "ornaments" are hair flowers and hairclips.

Nacha said:

Probably lee-enfield_(girls'_frontline) with this post #5021790 design.

Just adding two things: Removing "monocle hair ornament" AND deprecating it will result in never being able to search for it in the future, even if there are images of minor character, other than Amelia Watson, wearing it. There is no alternate way to search for it. monocle hair_ornament doesn't work of course. (Not accounting for the BUR above)

As was already said, lee-enfield is wearing a "monocle_hairband", or it could be like a pair of goggles, just with one eye, not a "monocle_hair_ornament". Besides that, deprecation is not terminal, tags can be undeprecated if they need to be. Constantly pointing to nonexistant future characters isn't helpful. Unless you can point to such minor characters right now, Watson Amelia is the only person this tag applies to.

Second: Removing Monocle hair ornament will result in probably not being able to search for alternate hair ornaments on Amelia Watson, that are no whole design. For example post #4271044. You can solve this problem by accordingly adding alternate hair ornament, which is a real undertagged tag (just like no hair ornament). The count for such cases seems to be pretty low and most alternate hair "ornaments" are hair flowers and hairclips.

It's already not certain you can do that with monocle hair ornament because just subtracting the tag will also get you posts where the ornament isn't visible (head out of frame, facing away, completely nude including any accessories, ect.) as well as posts where it just wasn't tagged.

blindVigil said:

As was already said, lee-enfield is wearing a "monocle_hairband", or it could be like a pair of goggles, just with one eye, not a "monocle_hair_ornament". Besides that, deprecation is not terminal, tags can be undeprecated if they need to be. Constantly pointing to nonexistant future characters isn't helpful. Unless you can point to such minor characters right now, Watson Amelia is the only person this tag applies to.

I don't think it's useful to only talk about Amelia Watson now, because nuking + deprecating it would mean you have to populate it again if there suddenly are more characters with a monocle hair ornament (and the other tags of course too). So we're removing work that is already done that possibly has to be done again. I don't see the possible gain, especially if you consider, that one "useless" tag on any Amelia Watson image is doing no damage at all.

It's already not certain you can do that with monocle hair ornament because just subtracting the tag will also get you posts where the ornament isn't visible (head out of frame, facing away, completely nude including any accessories, ect.) as well as posts where it just wasn't tagged.

Didn't think I needed to add that, but for you, the search would be Watson_Amelia hair_ornament -monocle_hair_ornament of course, if you're searching for hair ornaments on Watson. It still has post not being tagged as m_h_o.

1 2