Genital mutilation tagging

There's no general tag for genital mutilation, and the only existing female tags are cunt punt and clitoris torture. While posts like post #9251225 feature an entire shotgun blast through her vagina. I bring up general because Pixiv tends to utilize a general purpose genital mutilation tag often (Frequently for female, but male posts are also scattered within). So I wanna know what proper tagging should be for something like the aforementioned post. Rule34.xxx tends to use x_torture for various parts. They're not a model example of tagging, but they have enough varied content that they're tagging it at all.

In short, pussy torture tag and genital torture tag with implications. Thoughts?

I would expect genital mutilation posts to show visible, external mutilation of the genitals. In your example post, the vagina is just the entry point. Sure, we can safely say the vaginal canal is pretty much obliterated at this point, but we don't actually see any damage down there other than what you would normally expect with a vaginal object insertion.

Blank_User said:

but we don't actually see any damage down there other than what you would normally expect with a vaginal object insertion.

The fallopian tubes/womb are part of the viscera exiting her body, a bit in the upper center region of guts.

Though you do raise a fair point- to what extent can one feasibly tag genital mutilation? If a cannonball destroys your entire crotch region- like leaving a cartoonish hole there- how far can that region of obliteration extend before it's no longer genital focused?

I would say if there's no visible genital mutilation it should not be tagged as such. If I was the kind of degenerate that searched that kind of content (which I'm not!), I would expect the tag name to match the results.

Note that we already have a bunch of this stuff under female_circumcision and circumcision.