Lightsaber implications

BUR #42557 has been rejected.

remove implication lightsaber -> energy_sword
create implication blue_lightsaber -> energy_sword
create implication green_lightsaber -> energy_sword
create implication orange_lightsaber -> energy_sword
create implication orange_lightsaber -> lightsaber
create implication pink_lightsaber -> energy_sword
create implication purple_lightsaber -> energy_sword
create implication red_lightsaber -> energy_sword
create implication white_lightsaber -> energy_sword
create implication yellow_lightsaber -> energy_sword

post #9444112 has a lightsaber but it isnt an energy sword, so instead of implicating lightsaber it should implicate color_lighsaber instead.

Lightsabers are by definition energy swords so that line removing the implication is already enough for me to downvote the BUR. The sample post is still by all accounts a lightsaber, it's simply not a powered energy sword. As for the lightsaber colours, I'm typically not fond of them but they're pretty significant in Star Wars works so I'm not super opposed to them. If there was no implication removal though it'd just bring me to a meh. Nothing seems upvotable here to me honestly.

Yeah the example post is equivalent to like... sword sheathed. Just because you can't see the blade of the sword doesn't mean it shouldn't be tagged sword.

The bulk update request #42557 (forum #361434) has been rejected by @harlanddeez.

Ylimegirl said:

Yeah the example post is equivalent to like... sword sheathed. Just because you can't see the blade of the sword doesn't mean it shouldn't be tagged sword.

Sword hilt maybe...