Posted under General
Is there value in adding media assets to visually associate each of the flower names and species? I've been finding it tricky to properly tag my flowers because it takes a bit of time to remember what each one looks like. Asking since it'll be a large project over a few days.
If you mean adding examples of what each flower looks like to its wiki or list of flowers or flower request, sure, go for it.
Yes! That's a great idea actually, we have a lot of flower related tags. However with that many assets you should probably use [expand] blocks like the shoes and chair wikis. I recommend you to first update the wiki by listing all the tags that you want to include, and THEN start adding assets.
Edit: Looks like someone already made the list. Funny, we have list of flowers and Tag group:flowers
It's fine to add examples to meta wikis like list of flowers or tag group:flowers, but the flower wiki itself shouldn't overdo it. It shouldn't try to list pictures of every flower in existence. I see people do that with other top-level umbrella tags like hat, shoes, skirt, bag, pants, etc and I think it's terrible.
It's impossible to read a wiki when it has a hundred different images hidden behind ten different [expand] blocks, and half the images are either bad examples that barely feature the item in question, or they're tiny tags with like three posts each that don't even deserve being listed on the same level as larger tags that actually matter.
Just wanna say as someone fond of flower aesthetics, thank you for adding images. Though I must note list of flowers seems rather barebones right now. Would it be wise to insert reference images of the flowers under tag group:flowers into list of flowers?
