Why was this post deleted?

Posted under General

I would have reapproved it if I had noticed that the pixiv version was way smaller and it appears fencedude agrees.

I made my suggestion based on the perception that the pixiv version was larger, there is no point in appealing a small version of an image that you have located a much larger version of.

Kayako said:
and posts should not be reuploaded. Appeal it and accept the staff's decision.

Its not a reupload of the deleted image, just an alternate version. People normally do upload duplicates with different resolutions and that's not against the rules.

Only in the case where the image itself is significantly different, or where the resolution and/or quality are higher with the later upload. Uploading smaller dupes is still a bad idea, and a pretty good way to ensure something dies in the queue.

So was it off topic or the artist was on the banned artist list?

Shinjidude said:
Only in the case where the image itself is significantly different, or where the resolution and/or quality are higher with the later upload. Uploading smaller dupes is still a bad idea, and a pretty good way to ensure something dies in the queue.

That makes sense.

1