Posted under General
Implicating popo_(ice_climber), nana_(ice_climber) -> ice_climbers.
Reason: All character tags, but not all pictures tagged with either Popo or Nana have the Ice_climbers tag as well.
Ice_climbers being separate from Ice_climber, of course. Perhaps maybe change the character tag to Ice_climbers_(characters) to avoid confusion or whatever?
Updated by 葉月
The copyright for them is Ice_Climber, while it seems Ice_Climbers is being used as a character tag for either of them, likely due to them being called that from Smash Bros.
Fencedude said:
No reason for that then. Just call them by their names.If people aren't tagging it right, then fix it.
I don't see why not, it saves having to use two tags. Not all posts have both of the climbers in them, and how many people actually know they're called Popo and Nana?
Dedari said:
I don't see why not, it saves having to use two tags. Not all posts have both of the climbers in them, and how many people actually know they're called Popo and Nana?
The fact that not all of their posts have both means we DEFINITELY should use their names.
As for people not knowing, tough cookies.
Keep in mind that this is another character tag which is designating both climbers as a single entity, I suppose you could call it.
Either way I don't care if it's purged, aliased, or implicated. Simply removing the tag won't keep people from using it again, and I don't think it's possible to implicate the tag into two other tags while still keeping it from showing up on images. Same with aliasing, I don't think you can make it to add both tags into yer search.
