Tag Suggestion: group_incest

For images where more than two family members are involved in a singular group_sex act?

incest group_sex wouldn't cut it, since someone unrelated could be involved with two relatives.

I don't really think that we need to have a group distinction for incest. The wiki says sex between family members, it never stated that it can't invlove more than 2 people.

Sure, not needed, but would there be interest in "fun for the whole family" searches without including "our little secret / don't tell [your] mom/dad" couplings?

Completely unnecessary.

Meh, incest is one of those tags that has always seemed to be on shaky ground in the first place, given that tagging it requires foreknowledge about the setting not immediately obvious from the picture.

That said, we do keep using the incest tag, so if there are enough posts that fit the criteria for group_incest, I don't see any reason not to use it in turn. Surely someone wants to search for that sort of thing.

glasnost said:
Meh, incest is one of those tags that has always seemed to be on shaky ground in the first place, given that tagging it requires foreknowledge about the setting not immediately obvious from the picture.

Except where narration and dialogue present in the image itself explicitly spell it out, yes.
I've always had issue with the tag because of this.

Most of it appears to be related to dialogue or blatant names (ie the kagamine twins which are a large chunk of the tag and doesn't require a huge logical leap) but I only skimmed the first few pages.

I'm not big on any of the family-relation tags for spoiler reasons, but since this one is too major a tag to remove (and has some legit non-spoiler uses) I guess we can do group_incest. Even if I agree it's not all that necessary.

I figure that if someone wanted a larger-than-a-pair situation, they'd have to search a combo of incest and any of sisters, brothers, brother_and_sister, mother_and_daughter, mother_and_son, father_and_daughter, father_and_son, not to mention indirect relatives like aunts, uncles, and cousins (grandparents?!), so to make it easier for the sick fucks of Danbooru to stay safely at their computers, I see merit.

T5J8F8 said: I figure that if someone wanted a larger-than-a-pair situation, they'd have to search a combo of incest and any of sisters, brothers, brother_and_sister, mother_and_daughter, mother_and_son, father_and_daughter, father_and_son

I don't want to do anything that would encourage further use of familial relationship tags.

So, wait...a no or yes to the proposed tag, since I've gone through and tagged what I could discern. In the midst, I thought incest family might cover the mass-sinnery, but maybe the latter wouldn't be applied if some unfamiliar was involved.

group_incest is okay, I'm just saying that suggesting incest + the various family tags (which I know you weren't) isn't anything I support because it would encourage more use of those tags.