A problem with a "breast grab"...

post #815978 shows a grabbing (or similar gerund) of a breast...on a male. What with the stir occurring in forum #52946, I'd like to know how to handle this, since breast_grab implicates breasts, and while its wiki doesn't currently imply "no boys allowed", it doesn't give an explicit OK, either. Also tagged it with androgynous, as suggested/mandated in the course of the linked thread.

Perhaps we need a male breast grabbing tag?

Such as moob_grab? Male_breast_grab?

If there are going to be images that will be tagged as such and similar to this post, then it might be best to make another tag.

I can kinda see that as more of an exaggerated nipple tweak than a breast grab.

However, if that's not something we can agree on, then a single exception to a rule is sufficient grounds to remove an implication, so we would then need a break of the breast grab → breasts implication, followed by a breast grab → chest grab (or similar) alias.

A spear counterpart tag would be much more useful than a general purpose tag, especially given how rare it is to have a picture of a dude getting groped.

chest_grab would be better to describe it (moob_grab and male_breast_grab just look silly). Sure, some people might get confused and throw females in, but that's what the wiki is for and we can always swat down implication requests.

I'm liking chest_grab. Has a nice rhyme with breast_grab, and perhaps could extend to all masculine chest fondling.

I favor one of two solutions:
1) It really doesn't need to be tagged with anything, or
2) sgc's nipple_tweak seems appropriate. This doesn't seem to warrant a whole new tag that will quite understandably confuse people.