Tag Implication: clitoris_tweak -> clitoris

Posted under General

jxh2154 said:
Can't it be getting clearly tweaked without itself being visible? Barely hidden by a hand or whatnot.

I don't doubt that there's cases where "It can't be anything but," but does anyone have an example on hand?


  • Reply
  • i think the tweak in post #270419 should be tagged clitoris as well, because i don't think it's necessary to differ between covered and uncovered ones as long as they are visible.

    but maybe post #247603 is a reason against the implication. the clit tweak is obvious, although i can't make out the clit in this pixelated mess of fingers, panties and cum.

  • Reply
  • 1