Why is this implication even here?
Updated by jxh2154
Posted under General
Why is this implication even here?
Updated by jxh2154
Because... it's true?
It's probably an old implication that needs to be reevaluated but it's not wrong.
All of her personalities are implicated to her, it seems. Whether this is a good idea is probably best left to someone who's seen the show, which excludes me.
Well, I know next to nothing about the show, I just came across it while browsing. I think that since all of the personalities have character tags, they should be separate, but I don't feel completely confident about it now.
I support this implication since they are literally just different personalities of the same character. They aren't separate personas or alternate forms.
I'd support leaving it, but I'm not sure it's even important enough to worry about, as we're not exactly awash in Mahoraba posts lately.
I guess unless the discussion is policy-based.
Don't think I have an opinion either way. Removing the implication and only using the alternate personality's tag would have the benefit of being able to filter out solo images of each personality. There's not really many images of any of them, though, so it barely matters.
EB said: There's not really many images of any of them, though, so it barely matters.
Yeah.
Anyway we can leave it, it's not a spoiler or anything and we're unlikely to see many more Mahoraba images anyway.