... for posts where characters very prominently show fondness towards each other, but in a non-romantic way.
Examples: post #925944, post #853073
Any objections?
Updated by Aristocrat
Posted under General
... for posts where characters very prominently show fondness towards each other, but in a non-romantic way.
Examples: post #925944, post #853073
Any objections?
Updated by Aristocrat
I like the idea.
It's quite like the tag love.
Bapabooiee said:
... for posts where characters very prominently show fondness towards each other, but in a non-romantic way.Examples: post #925944, post #853073
Any objections?
I don't mind a supertag, but I think we've got this covered well enough with hug / snuggle / nuzzle + happy.
That said there may be other relevant types of interactions we currently have no tag for.
And I don't like the ambiguity of the love tag. I'd rather restrict it to the word itself when it's written on something.
I'm not all that keen on having a tag used just to keep track of when a certain word is in a picture as opposed to an element in the picture itself.
Affection is better than love, agreed.
That being said, under what circumstances would affection apply to (or not apply to)? For instance, if we had, say, a picture of Kuroko jumping ontop of Misaka with hearts in her eyes, would this constitute affection (because we all know how affectionate she is)? Or would it be limited to pictures where recipient of the affection is actually happy to accept it?
EDIT: derp.
Updated
Bapabooiee said:
... for posts where characters very prominently show fondness towards each other, but in a non-romantic way.
The latter.
e: :)
Updated
Cyberia-Mix said: The latter.
That was my proposed definition for the tag, not a question.
e: :) 2.0
Updated
Bapabooiee said:
That was my proposed definition for the tag, not a question.
That was a response to the question posted above, not your OP.