The bulk update request #6234 (forum #191169) has been rejected by @ljhkhjkghjybtvhyt.
Posted under General
The bulk update request #6234 (forum #191169) has been rejected by @ljhkhjkghjybtvhyt.
The bulk update request #6235 (forum #191171) has been approved by @evazion.
BUR #6251 has been approved by @evazion.
mass update pool:Touhou_-_Cirno_-_09.09 -> -pool:Touhou_-_Cirno_-_09.09 cirno_day
Just like any other day tag (pocky day, bunny day, panties day etc).
The bulk update request #6251 (forum #191274) has been approved by @evazion.
BUR #6285 has been rejected.
mass update pool:14571 -> chromatic_aberration_abuse -pool:14571
I don't see a reason this should be a pool when something similar (lens flare abuse) is a tag, unless the decision is to swap the other way around and make lens flare abuse a pool (in which case the post order for chromatic aberration abuse should probably be changed since it's hidden from the pools page on safe mode).
basedheero said:
BUR #6285 has been rejected.
mass update pool:14571 -> chromatic_aberration_abuse -pool:14571
I don't see a reason this should be a pool when something similar (lens flare abuse) is a tag, unless the decision is to swap the other way around and make lens flare abuse a pool (in which case the post order for chromatic aberration abuse should probably be changed since it's hidden from the pools page on safe mode).
topic #13425, topic #13958, topic #15701, topic #16702
skylightcrystal said in forum #164232:
Because Chromatic Aberration Abuse is, as the description states, about when chromatic aberration is used to the point that it is "straining and painful on the eyes", which is inherently subjective. The equivalent definition to the one I gave for lens_flare_abuse cannot be applied to chromatic aberration abuse as with a sufficiently bad lens you can get levels of chromatic aberration beyond anything on the site - potentially up to the entire contents of the image being totally obscured by the aberration. The location and quantity of lens flare on an image, on the other hand, is dependent on the location of light sources, and thus it's perfectly possible (and not particularly uncommon) for a drawn image to have lens flare that you can categorically state would not happen in a real photo - post #2865546, post #2515452 and post #735796 are some examples.
Thus chromatic aberration abuse is and can only ever be subjective, whereas lens flare abuse can be entirely objective.
The bulk update request #6287 (forum #191510) has been approved by @evazion.
pool #4184 seems pretty objective.
Username_Hidden said:
pool #4184 seems pretty objective.
I agree, but I can't think of a good tag name.
nonamethanks said:
I agree, but I can't think of a good tag name.
pokemon furniture?
Although it doesn't just deal with furniture, so maybe pokemon objects?
EDIT: there is also pool #4243 that looks objective.
pool #4145 as well, it's very similar to the first Pokemon pool mentioned.
Unbreakable said:
pool #4145 as well, it's very similar to the first Pokemon pool mentioned.
Is it? pool #4184 is for inanimate objects designed to look like pokemon. pool #4145 is for tools/devices/objects with Nitori's name on it (as a brand marker), they have nothing in common besides this.
They seem pretty different to me.
The old "False Smiles" pool (pool #5972) is still getting the occasional addition, despite being replaced with the false smile tag.
The bulk update request #6023 (forum #189753) has been approved by @evazion.
This pool (pool #14836) only has two posts, both of which are from more than two years ago.
Should just expand pool #11659 ("Kantai Collection - Frightened Shipgirls (Jack Dempa)") to other copyrights. He's done this gimmick with several copyrights.
The bulk update request #6285 (forum #191491) has been rejected by @nonamethanks.
BUR #6640 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
mass update pool:Pokemon_-_Eeveelution -> evolutionary_line
I created evolutionary line a while ago to search for this specific kind of concept. Now that the tag exists and is decently populated, we don't need the specific pool anymore since it's a pretty objective concept.