Tag alias: sitting_pantyshot -> pantyshot_sitting

Tag alias: sitting_pantyshot -> pantyshot_sitting

Order of words.

It seems as if the word order of the tag is backwards, doesn't it? Since it's a pantyshot that occurs while sitting, shouldn't the former be changed to the tag, and the latter made to alias it?

Arrei said:
It seems as if the word order of the tag is backwards, doesn't it? Since it's a pantyshot that occurs while sitting, shouldn't the former be changed to the tag, and the latter made to alias it?

As long as both orders are available... I wouldn't object having sitting pantyshot as the main name

Arrei said:
shouldn't the former be changed to the tag, and the latter made to alias it?

+1
Alternatively we could introduce seated_pantyshot, but... same thing. Just sounds a bit better... I think.

Leave pantyshot_sitting as the main tag.
Saves me time when looking at the tags.
Easier for my tag auto-completion.
Sitting_Pantyshot makes it sound like a pantyshot is some kind of entity with legs that can sit down.

Given a choice, I'd prefer seated_pantyshot.

Actually, is this tag needed at all?
A pantyshot sitting search seems to do pretty well (in fact it does better afaict), and I don't see why it shouldn't.

SystemXS said:
Actually, is this tag needed at all?
A pantyshot sitting search seems to do pretty well (in fact it does better afaict), and I don't see why it shouldn't.

The idea of deleting that tag as superfluous (preferably by aliasing pantyshot sitting -> sitting, because the tag pantyshot is more likely to be consistently used) is attractive. We also have these related searches:

• standing pantyshot
• lying pantyshot

Sitting and standing are very undertagged, though.

jjj14 said:
Sitting and standing are very undertagged, though.

But the tag pantyshot_sitting (106 pages) is even more undertagged than the search pantyshot sitting (162 pages).

(And pantyshot_sitting implicates pantyshot+ sitting, so the aforementioned search includes all the results of the combo tag.)

Danielx21 said:
But the tag pantyshot_sitting (106 pages) is even more undertagged than the search pantyshot sitting (162 pages).

While pantyshot sitting -pantyshot_sitting mostly results in posts that are missing the pantyshot_sitting tag, you should keep in mind that with more than one character around the sitting one doesn’t have to be the one flashing their underwear: post #13040, post #902235, post #1008472

kittey said:
While pantyshot sitting -pantyshot_sitting mostly results in posts that are missing the pantyshot_sitting tag, you should keep in mind that with more than one character around the sitting one doesn’t have to be the one flashing their underwear: post #13040, post #902235, post #1008472

I removed pantyshot from the first two posts you mentioned, they're just panties. (i.e. they're not accidentally visible)

But I see your point.

This alias was never put in place, but sitting_pantyshot (which may get used every now and then) should be aliased to the currently used pantyshot_(sitting) at least.

Since there's pantyshot_(standing) and pantyshot (kneeling), I think it should match that format and be pantyshot_(sitting).

Kakyoin01 said:
Since there's pantyshot_(standing) and pantyshot (kneeling), I think it should match that format and be pantyshot_(sitting).

Yeah, that's what I said. This thread came before the discussion in forum #78699 so I updated the alias request in my bump.

I'd second this. It's a bit fine grained of a combo tag, but it's useful in the same way the crossed legs tags are, so I'd get behind it.

Did
create alias sitting_pantyshot -> pantyshot_(sitting)