Danbooru

Loli/shota check thread.

Posted under General

kittey said:

Child yes, parent is currently rated safe. I’d rate it questionable for cameltoe and covered nipples, but I know others wouldn’t.

It depends on how prominent they are, here I would say it's prominent enough for a Q.

ion288 said:

Ah, my mistake. Didnt notice the loli tag. I can see an argument for the imouto post but the rest are clearly safe. Anyone else have anny input?

The two middle ones are the ones I would even consider close to loli but yeah, I agree with you.

bucolic said:

A little over a hundred pages worth of images, quite a few having exposed nipples, have been explicitly categorized as non-sexual, i.e pool #1536.

There are 204 posts in that pool tagged loli. So close to ten percent. pool #1536 is for nudity in non-sexual situations. Weather
a naked child acts in a sexual way matters little for the loli/shota tag. Though there are plenty examples of child rating:q that probably should have the tag.

tapnek said:

You want to label all of them with the Loli/Shota tag?

Not sure I understand what you mean here. No one has suggested tagging adult people loli/shota.
---

post #1438573
Currently tagged child while identical parent is tagged loli.