Implicate vaginal_insertion -> vaginal
Implicate vaginal_insertion -> insertion
Implicate anal_insertion -> anal
Implicate anal_insertion -> insertion
Reason: Subsets.
Updated
Posted under General
Implicate vaginal_insertion -> vaginal
Implicate vaginal_insertion -> insertion
Implicate anal_insertion -> anal
Implicate anal_insertion -> insertion
Reason: Subsets.
Updated
S1eth said:
Didn't we decide to get rid of those tags by aliasing them to vaginal and anal respectively?
It looks like it was suggested in forum #75988, but not decided.
I just realized we also have forum #82636 (I should have searched), which seems like a more suitable place to continue this. Forget this thread.
So since my suggestion in forum #85516 about removing these two tags never got anywhere, can we at least implicate them instead?
Having them separate-but-not-implicated seems silly.
large_insertion → large, insertion
Ha ha, just kidding. But vegetable_insertion → vegetable, insertion, might make sense.
meatwagon said:
large_insertion → large, insertion
Ha ha, just kidding. But vegetable_insertion → vegetable, insertion, might make sense.
It might make sense if vegetable_insertion was actually a tag... but it's not.
Toks said:
It might make sense if vegetable_insertion was actually a tag... but it's not.
vegetable_dildo is the currently used tag for that concept.
(that feeling you get when you realize you are having a serious discussion on tag ontologies for sexual paraphilias... essence of Danbooru)
jjj14 said:
vegetable_dildo is the currently used tag for that concept.
(that feeling you get when you realize you are having a serious discussion on tag ontologies for sexual paraphilias... essence of Danbooru)
I don't get why vegetable_dildo implicates dildo when it seems that the items in question aren't really dildos, but normal vegetables being used like dildos.
I also don't understand why that tag needs to exist at all when searching for vegetable insertion should be enough, if the posts were properly tagged.
If we really need to keep this tag too for some reason, then:
remove implication vegetable_dildo -> dildo
create alias vegetable_dildo -> vegetable_insertion
create implication vegetable_insertion -> vegetable
create implication vegetable_insertion -> insertion
S1eth said:
Vegetable insertion could possibly include fruits such as eggplants.
So basically this vegetable_dildo tag not only has dildo in its name despite not being used for dildos, but also has vegetable in its name despite not being used solely for vegetables. I'm beginning to suspect that it's poorly-named.
Food_insertion might be a more accurate name.
Toks said:
So basically this vegetable_dildo tag not only has dildo in its name despite not being used for dildos, but also has vegetable in its name despite not being used solely for vegetables. I'm beginning to suspect that it's poorly-named.
Food_insertion might be a more accurate name.
Definitely a +1 for food_insertion.
So, about those implications from the OP.
create implication vaginal_insertion -> vaginal
create implication vaginal_insertion -> insertion
create implication anal_insertion -> anal
create implication anal_insertion -> insertion
Can we do them? Or can we get rid of these two tags entirely?
remove alias vegetable_dildo -> food_insertion
Examples: post #174255, post #2180263
The fruit/vegetable is an object, not an action.
I don't understand the outcome of this. It seems like vegetable_dildo isn't used, but I can't find anything about it in the implication, alias, or history search.
Anyway, there is now a fruit_dildo tag, which should probably be gotten rid of in the same way and for the same reasons.