Tag implication: thighband_pantyhose -> pantyhose

create implication thighband_pantyhose -> pantyhose

Link to implication

Subset.

Done

I'm somewhat late with this and it's only partially related to this thread, but what people think about reversing the word order in thighband_pantyhose?

Maybe that's just me, but thighband_pantyhose does sound weird and kind of unnatural. So I think that pantyhose_thighband would be better.

Related: topic #8641 starting from my post.

Nothing wrong with either, really. One reads "This is a pair of pantyhose containing a thighband" and the other reads "This is the thighband on a pair of pantyhose".