Tag implication: bloody_hands -> blood

create implication bloody_hands -> blood

Link to implication

the former requires the latter.

also

create implication bloody_clothes -> blood

create implication bloody_weapon -> blood

create implication bloody_teeth -> blood

possibly create implication bloody teeth -> teeth (since it being bloody makes it a tad bit more prominent)

create implication bloody_wings -> wings

create implication blood_from_mouth -> blood

create alias blood_on_hair -> bloody_hair (fits more with how other images are tagged)

create implication bloody_hair -> blood

create alias blood_on_wings -> bloody_wings

create implication blood_writing -> blood

Anelaid said:

create implication bloody_hands -> blood

create alias blood_on_fingers -> bloody_fingers
create implication bloody_fingers -> blood (Do we also want to add an implication to bloody_hand?

How is bloody_fingers different from bloody_hands at all?

possibly create implication bloody teeth -> teeth (since it being bloody makes it a tad bit more prominent)

post #1295136 is not prominent. post #1100316 gets closer, but it's still a white outline. I would expect detailed teeth like post #1396121, but I'll admit that teeth is polluted to hell, so I don't really care anymore.

Hillside_Moose said:
How is bloody_fingers different from bloody_hands at all?

Probably not much since the tag got cleared out.

Did:
create implication bloody_weapon -> blood
create implication bloody_teeth -> blood
create implication bloody_teeth -> teeth
create implication bloody_wings -> wings
create implication blood_from_mouth -> blood
create alias blood_on_hair -> bloody_hair
create implication bloody_hair -> blood
create alias blood_on_wings -> bloody_wings
create implication blood_writing -> blood
create alias bloody_fingers -> bloody_hands

create implication bloody_clothes -> blood already existed.