Danbooru

Pool to tag: Implied Futanari

Posted under General

I think pool #4790 (Implied Futanari) has a very clear definition and easy to tag. Futhermore, we have other existing implied_* around, so having implied futanari as a tag will keep things consistent. Here is my proposal for implied futanari wiki, if discussion agrees to change it into a tag:

Futa/possible futa, without the dick. Whether the character is futa in canon or not, whether related pictures have a dick showing or not, whether the artist clarifies that it is futa or not, are all irrelevant. As long as you can't see "it" in the picture, it is implied futanari. This tag and futanari tag are not mutually exclusive.

I'd recommend the opposite, since 90%+ of implied futanari is probably intended to be futanari, and is obviously such from the positions.

Buuuuut... I'm not gonna be adamant about it. I can see either argument. You might want to put a note to that effect in the description to avoid +/- tagging wars.

BCI_Temp said:
You might want to put a note to that effect in the description to avoid +/- tagging wars.

That's in the (edit: correct wiki page now) futa_with_female wiki:

Images depicting at least one futanari and one female having engaged in sexual interactions.
If you can't see the genitals of one or more of the females involved, use the rule of "fully female until proven otherwise".

Updated

1