This post was deleted for the following reason:

jpeg artifacts abound, sloppy lines especially on the hair, bad shading ()
kirishima sagiri (ukagaka) drawn by cr4781
  • Comments
    •
    Dreadhawk
    [hidden]

    This is the best image I've seen flagged for being "poorly drawn". There's not a single thing I can see wrong with this? Sloppy lines? Oh, let's get rid of all sketches on the site then. Bad hand? You can barely even see it, there's no problem with it. Bad shading? Because every artist is pro at it?

    Even the perspective with the background is well done. This shit is getting out of hand. If there was any way to ban people for stupidly flagging stuff, I'd hope they did.

  • 0
  • Reply
    • RaymooHakurei
    [hidden]

    Dreadhawk said:
    This is the best image I've seen flagged for being "poorly drawn". There's not a single thing I can see wrong with this? Sloppy lines? Oh, let's get rid of all sketches on the site then. Bad hand? You can barely even see it, there's no problem with it. Bad shading? Because every artist is pro at it?

    Even the perspective with the background is well done. This shit is getting out of hand. If there was any way to ban people for stupidly flagging stuff, I'd hope they did.

    If you actually have the time to berate flaggers on comment sections, take it to the forums

  • 0
  • Reply
    • kittey
    [hidden]

    Kikimaru said:
    I'd berate the flagger, but they're anonymous now.

    ...and that’s why they’re anonymous now.

    Dreadhawk said:
    This is the best image I've seen flagged for being "poorly drawn". There's not a single thing I can see wrong with this?

    Danbooru might not be the right place for you.

    Sloppy lines? Oh, let's get rid of all sketches on the site then. Bad hand? You can barely even see it, there's no problem with it. Bad shading? Because every artist is pro at it?

    One of these faults might not be enough, but I guess it just adds up.

    This shit is getting out of hand. If there was any way to ban people for stupidly flagging stuff, I'd hope they did.

    Please keep in mind that “flagging” does not equal “deleting”. It just means that the mods should have another look at it to decide whether it stays or not. The forum and wiki have more info on this if you actually want to know how this works.

  • 0
  • Reply
    • The Shadow
    [hidden]

    Actually, it should never should have been flagged, but not because of the value of the picture. Flagging is for pictures that have been accepted to the site already. If the quality is low enough to be flagged then it should pass through the mod queue and be deleted on it's own.

    Or at least that's always been the idea in the past.

  • 0
  • Reply