Danbooru
Login Posts Comments Notes Artists Tags Pools Wiki Forum More » Listing Upload Hot Changes Help

Search

Blacklisted (help)

  • guro
  • scat
  • furry -rating:g
Disable all Re-enable all

Artist

  • ? sentarou 85

Copyright

  • ? touhou 938k

Character

  • ? onozuka komachi 9.2k

General

  • ? 1girl 6.6M
  • ? blue dress 136k
  • ? breasts 3.8M
  • ? cleavage 1.1M
  • ? double v 31k
  • ? dress 1.5M
  • ? gigantic breasts 11k
  • ? hair bobbles 58k
  • ? hair ornament 1.6M
  • ? open mouth 2.6M
  • ? red eyes 1.4M
  • ? shiny skin 132k
  • ? short hair 2.5M
  • ? smile 3.2M
  • ? solo 5.5M
  • ? two side up 194k
  • ? v 172k

Meta

  • ? commentary request 3.6M

Information

  • ID: 1125001
  • Uploader: Schrobby »
  • Date: about 13 years ago
  • Approver: NWF Renim »
  • Size: 681 KB .jpg (875x980) »
  • Source: pixiv.net/artworks/25987086 »
  • Rating: Sensitive
  • Score: 9
  • Favorites: 58
  • Status: Deleted

Options

  • Resize to window
  • View smaller
  • View original
  • Find similar
  • Download

History

  • Tags
  • Pools
  • Notes
  • Moderation
  • Commentary

This post was deleted for the following reason:

Unapproved in three days after returning to moderation queue (over 10 years ago)
Resized to 97% of original (view original)
onozuka komachi (touhou) drawn by sentarou

Artist's commentary

  • Original
  • ダブピこまっちゃん

    こぼれそうでこぼれない

    • ‹ prev Search: user:Schrobby status:deleted next ›
  • Comments
  • Recommended
  • Loading...

    Arrei
    about 13 years ago
    [hidden]

    Appealers, you guys do realize there IS a rule against overly large body parts?

    I'm not actually familiar with the details or whether or not this one crosses the line after the rules were revised, but, just saying.

  • 0
  • Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    Schrobby
    about 13 years ago
    [hidden]

    When I uploaded this image I thought it was borderline but still fine considering Komachi is usually depicted really well endowed. Well, we'll see.

  • 1
  • Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    Virgorival
    about 13 years ago
    [hidden]

    This argument will never go away

    There should be other factors that should be considered when flagging or apporving borderline images

    as this one, Quality of the image far outweighs(giggity) the extreamly large breast she does have

    Infact, her anatiomy for having such large breasts are rather well done

  • 0
  • Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    Baphomet669
    about 13 years ago
    [hidden]

    Welp there ya go, Touhou = free pass no matter how bad and against the rules.

    corrupt politics as usual at Danboorou!

  • -7
  • Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    Wypatroszony
    about 13 years ago
    [hidden]

    Baphomet669 said:
    Welp there ya go, Touhou = free pass no matter how bad and against the rules.

    corrupt politics as usual at Danboorou!

    The uploader is Contributor rank, mr. Conspiracy Everywhere.

  • 0
  • Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    user 11314
    about 13 years ago
    [hidden]

    I don't like it, but I wouldn't be so petty as to mark it for deletion.

  • 1
  • Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    GMO
    about 13 years ago
    [hidden]

    Schrobby said:
    When I uploaded this image I thought it was borderline but still fine considering Komachi is usually depicted really well endowed. Well, we'll see.

    There's a difference between "well endowed" and "endowed too much."

  • -2
  • Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    Schrobby
    about 13 years ago
    [hidden]

    Baphomet669 said:
    Welp there ya go, Touhou = free pass no matter how bad and against the rules.

    corrupt politics as usual at Danboorou!

    No. If this image is against the rules it'll be deleted and I'll make sure not to upload similar ones in the future.

  • 0
  • Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    Bass
    about 13 years ago
    [hidden]

    Why are there rules like that in the first place? I prefer good art to abuse of artistic license, but if someone wants to draw a chick with boobs far beyond reality why not let them? And while I'm here, what is the principle difference between the ones with absurdly huge breasts and the ones with absurdly huge dicks? If we're going to be sticklers for anatomical correctness here, lets be all inclusive.

  • 1
  • Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    user 170235
    about 13 years ago
    [hidden]

    Wypatroszony said:
    The uploader is Contributor rank, mr. Conspiracy Everywhere.

    Doesn't make it any less true, though. A lot of crap gets approved every day just because it happens to be related to a certain handful of series that are apparently above the law.

  • -2
  • Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    MaryContrary
    about 13 years ago
    [hidden]

    Arrei said:
    Appealers, you guys do realize there IS a rule against overly large body parts?

    I'm not actually familiar with the details or whether or not this one crosses the line after the rules were revised, but, just saying.

    "I don't know the rules, but I'm going to say something about the rules, just saying!"

  • -1
  • Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    Arrei
    about 13 years ago
    [hidden]

    MaryContrary said:
    "I don't know the rules, but I'm going to say something about the rules, just saying!"

    Sigh. Needlessly volatile, aren't we?

    The original appeals seem to suggest they're not even aware there's a rule limiting the size of body parts. I am not aware of how to actually measure the ratio of head to body part to see if something's a violation, because it involved some sort of area or volume hullaballoo, so I didn't take any sides on the matter, but what's wrong with letting them know of the rule?

  • 0
  • Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    Arrei
    about 13 years ago
    [hidden]

    Bass said:
    Why are there rules like that in the first place? I prefer good art to abuse of artistic license, but if someone wants to draw a chick with boobs far beyond reality why not let them? And while I'm here, what is the principle difference between the ones with absurdly huge breasts and the ones with absurdly huge dicks? If we're going to be sticklers for anatomical correctness here, lets be all inclusive.

    The same rule does apply to penises. I have even less of a clue about how to measure that one. Length, perhaps?

  • 0
  • Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    Schrobby
    about 13 years ago
    [hidden]

    So it got approved. Success! Well, I'll still be more careful in the future.

    What I wonder now is if the negative points from the deletion flags are still there. The flags are gone and so should they, but it doesn't seem so.

  • 0
  • Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    lastsinz
    about 13 years ago
    [hidden]

    I think those are user vote-downs, not flag vote-downs..

  • 0
  • Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    Schrobby
    about 13 years ago
    [hidden]

    There were at least two from flags as well and it seems those are still here. After the flags were gone the score was the same.

  • 0
  • Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    Saladofstones
    about 13 years ago
    [hidden]

    The face is pretty good, its just everything below it.

  • -1
  • Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    Big Mario
    about 13 years ago
    [hidden]

    Delicious and soft, I approve.

  • 1
  • Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    Bass
    about 13 years ago
    [hidden]

    Arrei said:
    The same rule does apply to penises. I have even less of a clue about how to measure that one. Length, perhaps?

    If we're going by actual anatomy and allowing for some minor exaggerations, I'd say if it's larger than half their forearm it should be considered over-proportioned.

  • 0
  • Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    SinfireTitan
    over 12 years ago
    [hidden]

    Even if this was approved, this image should not be in the Perfect Breasts pool IMO.

  • 0
  • Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    Terms / Privacy / Upgrade / Contact /