A character's face mimicking fellatio (or even ahegao for that matter) doesn't guarantee any other ratings other than safe unless said image actually contains nudity.
A character's face mimicking fellatio (or even ahegao for that matter) doesn't guarantee any other ratings other than safe unless said image actually contains nudity.
doesn't it fall under "Sexually suggestive acts (sucking suggestively on hotdogs, etc.)."?
doesn't it fall under "Sexually suggestive acts (sucking suggestively on hotdogs, etc.)."?
This is a good point though. I personally think the wiki is wrong in that regard and the rule of what is considered a questionable image below takes precedence:
Rating:Questionable: For images that may contain some non-explicit nudity or sexual content, but that aren't quite pornographic.
Even if an image contains sexually suggestive acts, as long as said image contains no nudity whatsoever I think it should be rated safe.
Just because you're describing what she's doing doesn't mean there isn't anything implied. Her paw pose + open mouth is very suggestive in my eye.
Well it's not, we have a tag for fellatio_gesture and this doesn't even come close. There's nothing questionable about this image by the site's standards.
Fhtagn said:
Even if an image contains sexually suggestive acts, as long as said image contains no nudity whatsoever I think it should be rated safe.
It depends on how "explicit" the suggestive act is. Someone fellating a hotdog, or other phallic object, is way more sexually suggestive than someone just waving their fist back and forth. And certainly on a level far above someone whose hand is near their face with their tongue out.
Well it's not, we have a tag for fellatio_gesture and this doesn't even come close. There's nothing questionable about this image by the site's standards.
Indeed the gesture is not the same as the tagged fellatio gesture. I still see a fellatio gesture, but I get why you don't.
Fhtagn said:
This is a good point though. I personally think the wiki is wrong in that regard and the rule of what is considered a questionable image below takes precedence:
Rating:Questionable: For images that may contain some non-explicit nudity or sexual content, but that aren't quite pornographic.
Even if an image contains sexually suggestive acts, as long as said image contains no nudity whatsoever I think it should be rated safe.
I think that when it says "non-explicit nudity or sexual content", "Sexually suggestive acts" fall under "non-explicit sexual content". But I get that "Sexually suggestive acts" are hard to define (I see one when blindVigil doesn't)
