Danbooru
Login Posts Comments Notes Artists Tags Pools Wiki Forum More » Listing Upload Hot Changes Help

Search

Blacklisted (help)

  • guro
  • scat
  • furry -rating:g
Disable all Re-enable all

Artist

  • ? shimada fumikane 1.5k

Copyright

  • ? tsukuyomi moonphase 421

Character

  • ? hazuki (tsukuyomi) 367

General

  • ? 1girl 6.6M
  • ? 2004 534
  • ? animal ears 1.3M
  • ? bell 130k
  • ? black one-piece swimsuit 25k
  • ? cat ears 312k
  • ? copyright notice 31k
  • ? fake animal ears 168k
  • ? fang 356k
  • ? jingle bell 49k
  • ? one-piece swimsuit 145k
  • ? school swimsuit 66k
  • ? solo 5.5M
  • ? swimsuit 716k

Meta

  • ? end card 1.1k
  • ? highres 6.0M

Information

  • ID: 153564
  • Uploader: madcat »
  • Date: over 17 years ago
  • Size: 4.34 MB .png (1788x1201) »
  • Source:
  • Rating: Sensitive
  • Score: 16
  • Favorites: 21
  • Status: Active

Options

  • Resize to window
  • View smaller
  • View original
  • Find similar
  • Download

History

  • Tags
  • Pools
  • Notes
  • Moderation
  • Commentary
This post has 0 children (learn more) « hide
post #153564
Resized to 47% of original (view original)
hazuki (tsukuyomi moonphase) drawn by shimada_fumikane
  • ‹ prev Search: user:madcat next ›
  • « ‹ prev Pool: Popular Artists Draw Other Copyrights next › »
  • Comments
  • Recommended
  • Loading...

    葉月
    over 17 years ago
    [hidden]

    It could really use some post-processing love, the moire is very visible here. It's hard to give hard and fast rules about moire avoidance, but you should experiment with your scanner's settings (DPI, orientation) and consider applying selective Gaussian blur on the image.

  • 0
  • Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    Dr Fine Rolo
    over 17 years ago
    [hidden]

    Avoid moire: Don't scan at a higher resolution than the DPI of the image.

  • 0
  • Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    LaC
    over 17 years ago
    [hidden]

    There are filters specifically designed to eliminate the moire pattern while keeping mode details than a blur or a scale would.

  • 0
  • Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    madcat
    over 17 years ago
    [hidden]

    Ah okies, apologies for that. I'll have a mess around with my scanner and see what I can do to fix up any images that need it.
    Again I'm sorry about that ^^;;

  • 0
  • Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    Dr Fine Rolo
    over 17 years ago
    [hidden]

    I'm of the opinion that filters are bullshit.

    Unless you scan it three or four or 12 times and use some batshit-crazy interferometric filter that nets you 12000+dpi or some shit, you're not really going to get rid of it properly. AND THEN the best you're going to do is sharply define each one of the ink dots. And then guess what? You're going to drop it back down to 300-600 dpi anyway because that's what you print at because you don't own a print shop.

  • 0
  • Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    Terms / Privacy / Upgrade / Contact /