Danbooru
Login Posts Comments Notes Artists Tags Pools Wiki Forum More »
Listing Upload Hot Changes Help

Search

  • Help
guro
scat
furry -rating:g

Artist

  • ? saiguchi otoufu 1.9k

Copyright

  • ? kantai collection 511k

Characters

  • ? akebono (kancolle) 6.7k
  • ? ushio (kancolle) 7.2k

General

  • ? 2girls 1.1M
  • ? ahoge 738k
  • ? closed eyes 806k
  • ? comic 590k
  • ? dated 212k
  • ? eating 94k
  • ? food 496k
  • ? fruit 121k
  • ? greyscale 548k
  • ? incense 698
  • ? kayari buta 534
  • ? kneehighs 140k
  • ? long hair 4.9M
  • ? monochrome 689k
  • ? mosquito coil 349
  • ? multiple girls 1.7M
  • ? neck ribbon 160k
  • ? porch 1.3k
  • ? ribbon 1.2M
  • ? school uniform 872k
  • ? seed 770
  • ? serafuku 338k
  • ? side ponytail 194k
  • ? sitting 1.1M
  • ? skirt 1.7M
  • ? socks 450k
  • ? solid oval eyes 11k
  • ? spitting 2.4k
  • ? very long hair 1.1M
  • ? watermelon 10k
  • ? watermelon seeds 283
  • ? wind chime 3.0k

Meta

  • ? commentary request 3.6M
  • ? translated 584k

Information

  • ID: 1748350
  • Uploader: NWSiaCB »
  • Date: almost 11 years ago
  • Approver: TunerAinee »
  • Size: 68 KB .jpg (707x500) »
  • Source: twitter.com/otoufu_material/status/493339383336927232 »
  • Rating: General
  • Score: 5
  • Favorites: 9
  • Status: Active

Options

  • Resize to window
  • Find similar
  • Download

History

  • Tags
  • Pools
  • Notes
  • Moderation
  • Commentary
This post belongs to a parent (learn more) « hide
post #3324374
ushio and akebono (kantai collection) drawn by saiguchi_otoufu

Artist's commentary

  • Original
  • 潮ダイアリー 7月27日( ́・◡・`)

  • Comments
  • Recommended
  • Loading...

    Budman04
    almost 11 years ago
    [hidden]

    Anti-air fire?

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    T34-38
    almost 11 years ago
    [hidden]

    Budman04 said:

    Anti-air fire?

    Well AA for short. The capability of a ship to defend itself and the fleet against aircraft.

    In KanColle, Destroyers had the lowest AA stat.

    1 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    Gollgagh
    almost 11 years ago
    [hidden]

    other than submarines, ofc

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    NWSiaCB
    almost 11 years ago
    [hidden]

    Technically, destroyers have AA stats as good as the likes of Tenryuu, and the AA specialists like Shigure have as good as anyone short of a battleship.

    Historically, though, destroyers and light cruisers were the anti-air ships. Not because they carried more guns than the battleships, but because unlike KanColle's 6-slot-max, it was always cheaper and easier to carry a protective ring of destroyers and light cruisers than to pay the costs of more battleships. 12 destroyers with 1/6th the anti-air power each for less cost beats a single battleship, after all.

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    LucasHidemiKomori
    almost 11 years ago
    [hidden]

    Historically speaking, all of the IJN warships were sub-par in the AA department in comparison to American and British ships. Inferior radar (or lack of them) and fire control systems, and no proximity fuses reduced their defensive capabilities against aircraft.

    The Sanshiki incendiary shells were considered by American pilots as more of a pyrotechnics display than an effective AA weapon.

    The venerable QF 2-pounder had a low rate of fire, short effective range and was too complex for the Japanese industries to mass produce it.

    It's replacement, the Type 96 25mm did not fared much better: training and elevating was slow (even on power-operated mounts), the sights were inadequate against high speed targets, excessive muzzle flash and vibration made accurate fire difficult, the usage of fixed 15-rounds magazines lowered rate of fire (and the magazines had to be loaded by hand, since the Japanese never developed special tools for this task) and the 25mm rounds were too much light and short ranged to be effective against the fast and heavily armoured American planes.

    The 12.7cm/50 Type 3 guns mounted on the majority of IJNs destroyers were of limited use against aircraft due their slow training (about 6 degrees per second) and rate of fire (the use of bagged charges instead of cased shells and the need to manually ram the shells required the guns to be re-aimed after every shot).

    The 10cm/65 Type 98 gun was the best naval AA gun the IJN had at hand, but it's barrel had a short service life (thanks to the high muzzle velocity and fast rate of fire), and given the shortage of raw materials during the later stages of the war, the Japanese weren't able to build enough of them.

    Although the Japanese captured a 40mm Bofors gun from British forces on Singapore, they weren't sucessful in reverse engineering it, due it's complexity.

    Updated by LucasHidemiKomori almost 11 years ago

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    Budman04
    almost 11 years ago
    [hidden]

    T34/38 said:

    Well AA for short. The capability of a ship to defend itself and the fleet against aircraft.

    In KanColle, Destroyers had the lowest AA stat.

    I know what it is, I commented before the translations were out.

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    Anti aircraft fire
    puka puka
    And today is watermelon day
    It's vexing, but we destroyers are very weak and have no means to fight against aerial attack.
    July 27th
    Terms / Privacy / Upgrade / Contact /