Well.. As long as the lolicon didn't laid their hand on real girl, i guess there's no harms done.. In my Tuna head, lolicon are different from pedophile because lolicon tend to stick to 2D girls.. (Just based from what i observed in my circles though..)
This reminded me of the rumor regarding a new regulation in my country, which said that pedophiles are subject to castration.. Considering the amount of sexual assault and offense on underage boys and girls, i'd agree strongly if this regulation become true..
While I don't exactly agree with the statement (as in everyone still have equality before law, no arbitrary detention, etc., etc., etc.). But if the said person decides to hurt real people, then I am all for locking them away and throw away the keys.
While I don't exactly agree with the statement (as in everyone still have equality before law, no arbitrary detention, etc., etc., etc.). But if the said person decides to hurt real people, then I am all for locking them away and throw away the keys.
The thing is, people don't have rights for simply existing. Those "natural" rights are seized by the individual as reality couldn't give a shit either way. What we normally talk about are legal rights, and then a citizen only has the benefit of it when they agree to follow the rules established by the country. So I would say a pedophile does not in fact have rights.
Besides, true lolicons do not violate lolis, they protect them. *smug face*