Danbooru
Login Posts Comments Notes Artists Tags Pools Wiki Forum More »
Listing Upload Hot Changes Help

Search

  • Help
guro
scat
furry -rating:g

Artist

  • ? mamuru 890

Copyrights

  • ? nier (series) 14k
  • ? ↳ nier:automata 12k

Character

  • ? 2b (nier:automata) 10k

General

  • ? 1boy 1.6M
  • ? 1girl 6.8M
  • ? ass 658k
  • ? bad perspective 1.7k
  • ? black dress 280k
  • ? blindfold 24k
  • ? blue eyes 2.0M
  • ? breasts 3.9M
  • ? censored 517k
  • ? dress 1.5M
  • ? female pubic hair 97k
  • ? hairband 544k
  • ? heart 677k
  • ? heart censor 20k
  • ? hetero 612k
  • ? mole 298k
  • ? mole under mouth 59k
  • ? nipples 923k
  • ? open mouth 2.7M
  • ? penis 465k
  • ? pubic hair 152k
  • ? sex 304k
  • ? short hair 2.5M
  • ? solo focus 400k
  • ? spread legs 284k
  • ? thick thighs 118k
  • ? thighhighs 1.3M
  • ? thighs 650k
  • ? vaginal 222k
  • ? white hair 814k

Meta

  • ? commentary request 3.6M
  • ? highres 6.2M
  • ? translation request 625k

Information

  • ID: 2639672
  • Uploader: Apollyon »
  • Date: over 8 years ago
  • Approver: zaregoto »
  • Size: 1.21 MB .png (1061x1500) »
  • Source: pixiv.net/artworks/61610456 »
  • Rating: Explicit
  • Score: 36
  • Favorites: 61
  • Status: Active

Options

  • Resize to window
  • View smaller
  • View original
  • Find similar
  • Download

History

  • Tags
  • Pools
  • Notes
  • Moderation
  • Commentary
Resized to 80% of original (view original)
2b (nier and 1 more) drawn by mamuru

Artist's commentary

  • Original
  • 2bさんといっぱいえっちする

    勢いで何枚か描きました。

    • ‹ prev Search: nier:automata ai:nier:automata,0% next ›
  • Comments
  • Recommended
  • Loading...

    draonclaw
    over 8 years ago
    [hidden]

    Yo, is this about to be the first post mamuru is going to get flagged for?

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    .grey
    over 8 years ago
    [hidden]

    Nah, there are other ones on the chopping block. I think this was right to get reapproved. It looks acceptable.

    It's just a certain user doing their thing, as has been for the past few weeks.

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    cokerpilot
    over 8 years ago
    [hidden]

    Mikaeri said:

    Nah, there are other ones on the chopping block. I think this was right to get reapproved. It looks acceptable.

    It's just a certain user doing their thing, as has been for the past few weeks.

    He's been doing a little longer then that and while he may be overzealous at times I think he really is just trying to help the site.

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    NWSiaCB
    over 8 years ago
    [hidden]

    Either he doesn't sleep or have a job and has multiple people running diversionary tactics just to let one person do all the actual flagging, or there's been more than one person involved in flagging. It's simply that most of them don't verbally argue back why they flagged something (flags were made anonymous for a reason), and one of them does.

    While there is a difference of opinion between individuals, there are certainly groups of people that form as much of a clique as make up the noisy dissenters of the cleanup process. Besides that, looking at the queue, the vast majority of flags are for sample images. Even leaving those aside, I see a lot more 10-year-old Albert uploads than new stuff.

    And Hell, the only thing that annoys me is that people are so ludicrously focused upon hip joints, while they at the same time keep on approving crappy giant breasted futanari furry porn sketches.

    1 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    .grey
    over 8 years ago
    [hidden]

    cokerpilot said:

    He's been doing a little longer then that and while he may be overzealous at times I think he really is just trying to help the site.

    The road to Hell is paved with good intentions.

    Much as I'd like to believe it's a variety of different people (and it is to some extent, thankfully), with flag reasons like those it's really only obvious who it is, or if not at that, you can deduce its the same person. And yes, most of the images in the flag queue are samples which pretty much fly by. And old albert stuff.

    I've never approved, much less seen these 'crappy giant breasted futanari furry porn' sketches, but I can only assume those would also be flagged, wouldn't they now? Because I would really only be fairly lenient to two of those (futanari and giant breasts), of which neither I've approved content of yet.

    EDIT: But I can agree on the hip joints thing. Dunno what makes that such an anatomical focus either. It's true your eyes are drawn to them but these aren't really that bad in my opinion.

    Updated by .grey over 8 years ago

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    user 460797
    over 8 years ago
    [hidden]

    The flag reason wasn't complaining about hip joints or hips, but because there doesn't seem to be a torso, because of these large and more importantly high crotch + hips.

    And her right breast is much bigger, but I only see that now.
    And I also don't know what is meant by "Either he doesn't sleep or have a job and has multiple people running diversionary tactics just to let one person do all the actual flagging, or there's been more than one person involved in flagging."?

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    user 460797
    over 8 years ago
    [hidden]

    @Mikaeri + @NWSiaCB

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    NWSiaCB
    over 8 years ago
    [hidden]

    @Provence
    I was speaking more generally about the "flagging boom", as was Mikaeri, when I was talking about "more than one person", and making a broad generalization about those flags to characterize them as "focused upon hip joints".

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    user 460797
    over 8 years ago
    [hidden]

    @NWSiaCB
    I'm afraid, but there isn' such a thing like "flagging boom". Maybe it seems that way, but like I mentioned multiple times (maybe not to you directly), but the same thing was done some months ago.

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    NWSiaCB
    over 8 years ago
    [hidden]

    Yes, well, I put it in quotes for that reason. (Although I guess it depends on where you count the start, it could be considered one "continuous boom" that has gone on for months if one's baseline was not ever really noticing flags.)

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    Terms / Privacy / Upgrade / Contact /