Why isn't this taged as futanari? Damm I need to learn how to add tags.
Technically its debateable if its a futanari or a transvestite. Because no pussy is present, it would be more correct to call it a newhalf- which is also a tag here.
Technically its debateable if its a futanari or a transvestite. Because no pussy is present, it would be more correct to call it a newhalf- which is also a tag here.
Oh, that makes sense. I just had seen some pics called "futanari with full pack" in cases where the futa hasn't pussy or/and also has balls. Thank you for answering!
I wonder why people keep discussing about this because who tf cares if it's or not futanari? You want to fap being a porn critic?
It's important for posts to be tagged properly so users can see what they want to see. For those groups, the distinction is important. And the debate is irrevelant now anyway since tagging it as newhalf (which is now futa without pussy) automatically adds futanari.
It's important for posts to be tagged properly so users can see what they want to see. For those groups, the distinction is important. And the debate is irrevelant now anyway since tagging it as newhalf (which is now futa without pussy) automatically adds futanari.
If you put it like that... Mmm... Still a bit weird spending your time... Like this... But I guess it's ok, I'm nobody to tell people how to live their lives either