Danbooru
Login Posts Comments Notes Artists Tags Pools Wiki Forum More » Listing Upload Hot Changes Help

Search

Blacklisted (help)

  • guro
  • scat
  • furry -rating:g
Disable all Re-enable all

Artist

  • ? mine (saiido123) 1

Copyrights

  • ? jojo no kimyou na bouken 49k
  • ? ↳ stardust crusaders 12k
  • ? real life 13k

General

  • ? 4boys 36k
  • ? alternate costume 494k
  • ? araki hirohiko (style) 1.3k
  • ? assisted carrying 102
  • ? boutonniere 785
  • ? carrying 51k
  • ? carrying over shoulder 3.6k
  • ? coffin 2.1k
  • ? collared shirt 532k
  • ? dancing pallbearers (meme) 62
  • ? dark skin 319k
  • ? emphasis lines 36k
  • ? expressionless 138k
  • ? formal clothes 71k
  • ? green background 49k
  • ? hat 1.3M
  • ? jojo pose 1.8k
  • ? let's hit the road (jojo) 15
  • ? lock 6.5k
  • ? male focus 831k
  • ? meme 62k
  • ? multiple boys 530k
  • ? muscular 156k
  • ? necktie 502k
  • ? parody 85k
  • ? pose 12k
  • ? sash 157k
  • ? serious 31k
  • ? shirt 2.1M
  • ? sound effects 31k
  • ? suit 82k
  • ? sunglasses 107k

Meta

  • ? chinese commentary 204k
  • ? commentary request 3.6M
  • ? ↳ check commentary 16k
  • ? derivative work 19k
  • ? ↳ screenshot redraw 4.1k
  • ? highres 6.0M

Information

  • ID: 3866873
  • Uploader: Tomzai »
  • Date: about 5 years ago
  • Approver: Squishy »
  • Size: 1.6 MB .jpg (1724x1080) »
  • Source: pixiv.net/artworks/80694611 »
  • Rating: General
  • Score: 39
  • Favorites: 75
  • Status: Active

Options

  • Resize to window
  • View smaller
  • View original
  • Find similar
  • Download

History

  • Tags
  • Pools
  • Notes
  • Moderation
  • Commentary
Resized to 49% of original (view original)
jojo no kimyou na bouken and 2 more drawn by mine_(saiido123)

Artist's commentary

  • Original
  • |
  • Translated
  • 抬棺十字军

    仅为整活,无意冒犯!

    Pallbearing crusaders

    Just for fun, nothing offensive

    • ‹ prev Search: user:Tomzai next ›
  • Comments
  • Recommended
  • Loading...

    Tomzai
    about 5 years ago
    [hidden]

    @nonamethanks Artist itself tagged the pixiv post with Joseph, Kakyoin, Jotaro and Avdol so don't remove those.

  • -4
  • Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    nonamethanks
    about 5 years ago
    [hidden]

    @Tomzai danbooru does not follow source tags 1:1. Above all you should only tag what you can see in the picture, save for rare exceptions.
    This picture references this famous scene of Stardust Crusaders, yes, but the copyright tag + tag for the meme (let's_hit_the_road_(jojo)) is enough. There's no direct visual indication of presence for those jojo characters, so their tags do not belong in this picture.
    Other cases for this are for example yandere_trance -gasai_yuno or loituma -ievan_polkka_(vocaloid).

    Updated by nonamethanks about 5 years ago

  • 2
  • Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    nonamethanks
    about 5 years ago
    [hidden]

    Also changed the artist name to add a qualifier. Next time don't nuke a gentag just because you want to replace it with an artist name.

  • 0
  • Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    blindVigil
    about 5 years ago
    [hidden]

    nonamethanks said:

    There's no direct visual indication of presence for those jojo characters, so their tags do not belong in this picture.

    Actually, both their faces and body types exactly match the characters listed. From left to right, it's Avdol, Kakyoin, Jotaro, and Joseph.

    Seems silly if that's not enough to tag them.

  • -1
  • Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    nonamethanks
    about 5 years ago
    [hidden]

    blindVigil said:

    Actually, both their faces and body types exactly match the characters listed. From left to right, it's Avdol, Kakyoin, Jotaro, and Joseph.

    Seems silly if that's not enough to tag them.

    It's a meme reference, of course they're the same. We still don't tag the characters if they're not in the picture though, unless there's no other way to find the picture. But this is a famous scene, so a tag for it will suffice.
    Here's another bunch of exact jojo references where we don't tag the characters:
    oh?_you're_approaching_me?
    kono_dio_da -dio_brando (some are tagged with the character but only because the face is copypasted from the original scene, like post #3573936)
    yes_i_am! -mohammed_avdol
    daga_kotowaru -kishibe_rohan
    taste_of_a_liar -bruno_buccellati

    Updated by nonamethanks about 5 years ago

  • 0
  • Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    blindVigil
    about 5 years ago
    [hidden]

    nonamethanks said:

    It's a meme reference, of course they're the same. We still don't tag the characters if they're not in the picture though, unless there's no other way to find the picture. But this is a famous scene, so a tag for it will suffice.

    That really doesn't make any sense to me. If it was just the pose, I could understand. Almost all of the examples you listed are also just other characters doing the poses/scenes, so of course you wouldn't tag the referenced characters there. But I don't see how that applies as well to an image where the four characters depicted are exact copies of four specific named characters, down to every facial detail, with the only difference being skin color.

    That sounds honestly ridiculous, but I'm not gonna get into a fight over it.

  • 0
  • Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    Tomzai
    about 5 years ago
    [hidden]

    nonamethanks said:

    Also changed the artist name to add a qualifier. Next time don't nuke a gentag just because you want to replace it with an artist name.

    That's first time that happened for me, i assure you it was not intentional. I somehow assumed that it would automatically differentiate the tags, i stand corrected.

    nonamethanks said:

    It's a meme reference, of course they're the same. We still don't tag the characters if they're not in the picture though, unless there's no other way to find the picture. But this is a famous scene, so a tag for it will suffice.
    Here's another bunch of exact jojo references where we don't tag the characters:
    oh?_you're_approaching_me?
    kono_dio_da -dio_brando (some are tagged with the character but only because the face is copypasted from the original scene, like post #3573936)
    yes_i_am! -mohammed_avdol
    daga_kotowaru -kishibe_rohan
    taste_of_a_liar -bruno_buccellati

    So you're saying that because that one picture has copypasted face from the anime (and only the face), it's eligible to be tagged with the character tag. But in this case where the artist has drawn the characters so close to the original (physique and face feature -wise) that from a glance someone could even think those are traced, but because the skin color, hairstyle and clothes are different, it doesn't count?

    Is that how it works? Is there any written guideline to this? Honestly im curious.

  • 2
  • Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    Harmonic Vector
    about 5 years ago
    [hidden]

    I mean, I can see Avdol in the back, but I don't know any of the others.

  • 1
  • Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    Valentine322
    about 5 years ago
    [hidden]

    Sanic_Hegehog said:

    I mean, I can see Avdol in the back, but I don't know any of the others.

    The one in front is definitely Joseph. The jawline is far too noticeable.
    That said, Kakyoin and Jotaro is a bit less clear for me.

  • 0
  • Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    iridescent slime
    about 5 years ago
    [hidden]

    Tomzai said:

    That's first time that happened for me, i assure you it was not intentional. I somehow assumed that it would automatically differentiate the tags, i stand corrected.

    I'm not calling you a liar, but how do you unintentionally remove a tag from nine other posts? Changing a general tag into an artist tag doesn't remove it from anywhere; it just makes the tag turn red. Unless you're using some sort of a script you would have had to manually remove the tag from each post individually, so what did you expect would happen after that?

  • 0
  • Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    Tomzai
    about 5 years ago
    [hidden]

    iridescent_slime said:

    I'm not calling you a liar, but how do you unintentionally remove a tag from nine other posts? Changing a general tag into an artist tag doesn't remove it from anywhere; it just makes the tag turn red. Unless you're using some sort of a script you would have had to manually remove the tag from each post individually, so what did you expect would happen after that?

    Since the artist tag and the general tag where (at that time) the same, i went and untagged the now incorrect artist tag since i couldnt figure out what else to do that point, so i at least did that.

    I intended to do something about it later but someone else got to it first.

  • 0
  • Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    iridescent slime
    about 5 years ago
    [hidden]

    Tomzai said:

    Since the artist tag and the general tag where (at that time) the same, i went and untagged the now incorrect artist tag since i couldnt figure out what else to do that point, so i at least did that.

    I intended to do something about it later but someone else got to it first.

    Yeah, I'm afraid it doesn't work that way. You can't have one tag with multiple tag types, because keeping them sorted would probably be a nightmare otherwise. Sorry you had to find this out the hard way. Next time you feel like creating an artist tag, make sure the tag isn't already being used for something else, because when artists create their usernames, they don't care how it will affect our tagging system.

    As for breaking things and intending to fix them later: don't do that. Like, ever. If you screw something up and don't know what to do, you'll save yourself a lot of future trouble by asking for help in the forums instead of just leaving a problem for someone else to deal with.

    Updated by iridescent slime about 5 years ago

  • 0
  • Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    Terms / Privacy / Upgrade / Contact /