Um . . . I thought flowers had BOTH male and female parts (the stamen and stigmas, respectively). Some are perfectly capable of self-pollination, but that's obviously not good for genetic diversity.
All a honeybee or other pollinating insect does (aside from drinking the nectar for food or taking it back for manufacturing into honey) is transfer the pollen from the stamens to the stigmas of differing flowers so as to enhance that species' gene pool. So technically the flowers in this picture should actually be hermaphrodites.
The bee doesn't fertilize a flower itself (and all bees who work are actually female); it just transfers the stuff necessary for fertilization.
So this is an entertaining if inaccurate interpretation of the process.
Mazryonh said: As awful as that image may be, it would be a more scientifically accurate anthropomorphization of the process.
Think about it the next time you see bees around flowers.
Of course, we require our porn to be scientifically accurate and obey the laws of physics.
I like to think I speak for all of us here when I say I find it annoying when the artist accidentally bends a knee through the fourth dimension or forgets the effects of gravity on breasts.
LOVE threads like this one. Reminds me of the threads from post #617838, post #454257, and post #535307 (WARNING: the third post may destroy your brain. View at your own risk.)
artanis00 said: Of course, we require our porn to be scientifically accurate and obey the laws of physics.
Speaking of accuracy, what say you about post #655768?
