Wait, you posted the exact same picture, only with the censoring...and made it the parent pic? I guess it works if you have a censorship fetish, but...

Uh, it's the parent because this one is the original source, by the artist, as opposed to the not-very-good photoshop.

Photoshop or not, at least it's not censored. I'm just wondering about the necessity of having the censored version, too. Oh well.

'Cause its the ORIGINAL, and not the hideous uncensored version of some 4channer.

Futaba, actually. And let's not kid each other, any uncensored version is superior to a censored one.

CapableScoutMan said:
Futaba, actually. And let's not kid each other, any uncensored version is superior to a censored one.

Lol no.

Bad or not, at least it's easier to make improvements. And it's not annoying, which the censoring is. Also, I don't see what's wrong with this one, I've seen far worse attempts.

Censorship issue aside, the artist's original image should always take precedence over any versions that were tampered with. This includes recolorings, nudefilters, photoshops, vectors, whathaveyou, uncensoring attempts included.

It's bad enough when an artist tries to draw the details of an anatomy he's never seen. It's worse when someone that can't even be an artist in their own right tries to correct that with details of an anatomy he's also never seen.

Dr_Fine_Rolo said:
It's bad enough when an artist tries to draw the details of an anatomy he's never seen. It's worse when someone that can't even be an artist in their own right tries to correct that with details of an anatomy he's also never seen.

tl;dr
I would rather they censor it.

Dr_Fine_Rolo said:
It's bad enough when an artist tries to draw the details of an anatomy he's never seen. It's worse when someone that can't even be an artist in their own right tries to correct that with details of an anatomy he's also never seen.

I do not think it is physically possible for me to agree with this more.

CapableScoutMan said:
Bad or not, at least it's easier to make improvements. And it's not annoying, which the censoring is. Also, I don't see what's wrong with this one, I've seen far worse attempts.

If I could stab you in the face via the internet, I would. Tell us in absolute (not relative) terms why it is not bad. "I've seen worse" is never, ever a valid defense.

Actually, I think this one looks better. In the uncensored one, the shop is so bad, it creeps me.

Oh, the reactions. I sense a lot of suppressed rage.

sillycon said:
If I could stab you in the face via the internet, I would. Tell us in absolute (not relative) terms why it is not bad. "I've seen worse" is never, ever a valid defense.

It's not precise, but anime-styled art doesn't have to be, your imagination fills the blanks.
I, for one, have seen so much censorship it annoys me, and would rather look at a "badly" uncensored version than a censored one, as it doesn't have the detrimental effect of pissing me off, at least.