Danbooru
Login Posts Comments Notes Artists Tags Pools Wiki Forum More » Listing Upload Hot Changes Help

Search

Blacklisted (help)

  • guro
  • scat
  • furry -rating:g
Disable all Re-enable all

Artist

  • ? kantoku 2.4k

Copyright

  • ? original 1.3M

Character

  • ? shizuku (kantoku) 249

General

  • ? 1girl 6.6M
  • ? black hair 1.7M
  • ? blush 3.2M
  • ? bra 221k
  • ? bra pull 7.5k
  • ? breasts 3.8M
  • ? clothes pull 87k
  • ? covering breasts 22k
  • ? covering privates 49k
  • ? hair dryer 1.5k
  • ? indoors 414k
  • ? looking at viewer 3.7M
  • ? medium hair 446k
  • ? navel 1.3M
  • ? nipples 906k
  • ? nude 544k
  • ? one side up 116k
  • ? open mouth 2.7M
  • ? plaid 11k
  • ? purple eyes 906k
  • ? pussy 400k
  • ? rain 38k
  • ? scrunchie 86k
  • ? skirt 1.7M
  • ? smile 3.2M
  • ? solo 5.5M
  • ? tears 251k
  • ? uncensored 149k
  • ? underwear 853k
  • ? undressing 60k
  • ? wet 159k
  • ? white bra 36k

Meta

  • ? highres 6.0M
  • ? resized 6.0k
  • ? source request 31k
  • ? third-party edit 25k
  • ? ↳ nude filter 2.2k

Information

  • ID: 3976506
  • Uploader: Megamet »
  • Date: almost 5 years ago
  • Approver: Ephyon »
  • Size: 925 KB .jpg (1078x1519) »
  • Source:
  • Rating: Explicit
  • Score: 166
  • Favorites: 264
  • Status: Deleted

Options

  • Resize to window
  • View smaller
  • View original
  • Find similar
  • Download

History

  • Tags
  • Pools
  • Notes
  • Moderation
  • Commentary

This post was deleted for the following reason:

Unapproved in three days after returning to moderation queue (almost 5 years ago)
This post belongs to a parent (learn more) « hide
post #4716707
Resized to 78% of original (view original)
shizuku (original) drawn by kantoku
  • ‹ prev Search: user:Megamet status:deleted next ›
  • Comments
  • Recommended
  • Loading...

    Insanity Demon
    almost 5 years ago
    [hidden]

    Unless someone can provide a source that proves otherwise, I'm gonna assume this is a nude filter, which is of course not allowed here.

  • 1
  • Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    blindVigil
    almost 5 years ago
    [hidden]

    Insanity_Demon said:

    Unless someone can provide a source that proves otherwise, I'm gonna assume this is a nude filter, which is of course not allowed here.

    It looks way too different compared to the parent for me to think this is a nude filter, it's literally an entirely separate image. The girl is actually in the house, the bathroom in fact, rather than standing in the doorway, her pose is entirely different, and it doesn't have any of the usual telltale signs of being edited by a third party.

  • 0
  • Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    IIRhete
    almost 5 years ago
    [hidden]

    It's probably a nude filter of this: https://twitter.com/kantoku_5th/status/1253514904297848832

  • 0
  • Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    kthxbai
    almost 5 years ago
    [hidden]

    If you look closely, you can make out where the bra and panties used to be because the shading becomes nonsense garbage around it

  • 0
  • Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    blindVigil
    almost 5 years ago
    [hidden]

    IIRhete said:

    It's probably a nude filter of this: https://twitter.com/kantoku_5th/status/1253514904297848832

    Given that tweet is from May and is a listing for ordering an art book(?) that isn't available anymore, I don't think there's enough evidence to say this wasn't made by the artist, without a source provided. If it really is a third party edit, someone put a lot more effort than usual into it.

  • 0
  • Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    Provence
    almost 5 years ago
    [hidden]

    blindVigil said:

    Given that tweet is from May and is a listing for ordering an art book(?) that isn't available anymore, I don't think there's enough evidence to say this wasn't made by the artist, without a source provided. If it really is a third party edit, someone put a lot more effort than usual into it.

    Call it what you like but given this work is uncensored should raise a big red flag, especially for a renowed artist like Kantoku.
    Then, the lines around the pussy aren't as sharp as the other lines.

    This is a pretty obvious nude filter.

  • 0
  • Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    NWF Renim
    almost 5 years ago
    [hidden]

    In regards to the flag, yande.re deleted this post for being an upscale not being a nude filter. This flag reason here gives the false impression that they deleted it for being a nude filter.

    Going with the reason for deleting it on yande.re though, that would suggest this image is an image sample version of what they had on their site given this is not the same resolution as over there. There is also noticeable amount compression artifacts in this compared to the other posts here and the version on twitter, despite the fact that those posts are much smaller in file size.

  • 0
  • Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    blindVigil
    almost 5 years ago
    [hidden]

    A very disingenuous flagging reason, nothing on yande.re is indicative of this being a nude filter. It definitely got fucked up by someone trying to resize it, though.

  • 0
  • Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    [deleted]
    almost 5 years ago
    [hidden]

    [deleted]

    carebu
    almost 4 years ago
    [hidden]

    It's a very good nude filter but it's definitely a nude filter. Sure, the genitals and breasts are high quality in a vacuum, but the things around them are big give aways, like the color bleed on her butt fang, the fact that the right breast is simply completely overlapping the bra layer, instead of it moving at all, the left nipple being way over displaced for how much the breast is being pushed on. I'm not saying these are terrible art mistakes, just that Kantoku wouldn't do this.

    (I'm speaking in terms of left/right from her perspective)

  • 0
  • Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    Terms / Privacy / Upgrade / Contact /