Ill be honest. I understand that this art and artist isnt my cup of tea. Everything about it makes me feel weird and I read some and saw some weird shit in my days.

But Seriously? Who approved this? This is the type of art I expect to see in some obscure corner of Pixiv with barely any actual comments on it cause it feels fetishy and weird. Not on Booru. It even stands out on the tags its posted under.

This isnt the first time lately I have been surprised by Danbooru with how weird some of the search results have been, showing me downright weird looking images. And btw, its not even about the fetish that is clearly present. Its about how its drawn. If I come onto Booru I expect many things. I expect porn for the most part. But I dont expect this. I expect to see well done artwork that looks pleasing to the eye only to see its still left waiting to be approved. But THIS somehow got approved in a days time?

Gikame said:

Ill be honest. I understand that this art and artist isnt my cup of tea. Everything about it makes me feel weird and I read some and saw some weird shit.

But Seriously? Who approved this? This is the type of art I expect to see in some obscure corner of Pixiv with barely any actual comments on it cause it feels fetishy and weird. Not on Booru. It even stands out on the tags its posted under.

This isnt the first time lately I have been surprised by Danbooru with how weird some of the search results have been, showing me downright weird looking images. And btw, its not even about the fetish that is clearly present. Its about how its drawn. If I come onto Booru I expect many things. I expect porn for the most part. But I dont expect this. I expect to see well done artwork that looks pleasing to the eye only to see its still left waiting to be approved. But THIS somehow got approved in a days time?

It was uploaded by a Contributor with unlimited upload privileges, so it bypassed the mod queue.

Edit:
You can use blacklists to avoid seeing similar content in the future. Something like

is:nsfw guro
is:nsfw ryona
is:nsfw torture
is:nsfw scat

on four separate lines will work. Or you can blacklist the artist or user (using "uploaderid:[INSERT NUMERIC USER ID]" without the brackets and quotes). Both can be fine tuned with is:nsfw or rating:explicit on the same line to avoid blacklisting non-nsfw/explicit posts.

You can also add further "weird" kinks that you dislike to your blacklist as you encounter them.

NNescio said:

is:nsfw guro
is:nsfw ryona
is:nsfw torture
is:nsfw scat

is:nsfw doesn't work in blacklists. You have to use ~rating:q ~rating:e instead.

Gikame said:

Ill be honest. I understand that this art and artist isnt my cup of tea. Everything about it makes me feel weird and I read some and saw some weird shit in my days.

But Seriously? Who approved this? This is the type of art I expect to see in some obscure corner of Pixiv with barely any actual comments on it cause it feels fetishy and weird. Not on Booru. It even stands out on the tags its posted under.

This isnt the first time lately I have been surprised by Danbooru with how weird some of the search results have been, showing me downright weird looking images. And btw, its not even about the fetish that is clearly present. Its about how its drawn. If I come onto Booru I expect many things. I expect porn for the most part. But I dont expect this. I expect to see well done artwork that looks pleasing to the eye only to see its still left waiting to be approved. But THIS somehow got approved in a days time?

I'm erring on the side of agreement with you but at the same time, this artist's SFW entries aren't too bad.

Gikame said:

Ill be honest. I’m whining about things I don’t like and don’t know what a blacklist is

Edit: you got so butt hurt about being called out that you flagged a post that didn’t break a single rule. Amazing, you’re a shining beacon of maturity.

Gikame said:
This isnt the first time lately I have been surprised by Danbooru with how weird some of the search results have been, showing me downright weird looking images.

Yea, I have noticed it as well. There have just been a big increase of not only these incredibly weird images, but also those of blatantly bad quality as of late. As in, shockingly bad. How anyone thought it was a good idea to upload them.

LOTR3 said:

Edit: you got so butt hurt about being called out that you flagged a post that didn’t break a single rule. Amazing, you’re a shining beacon of maturity.

Well Im glad you say this, want me to flag it again then for being grotesque which I already have, if you wanna act this snarky? Considering you were the one who actually went ahead and took against the flag of the content for me "admitting my bias"? How is this actual reasoning? Especially when I wrote: "Low effort" and on top "Looks grotqesque for the sake of it". So am I reporting just for low effort or also for "being grotesque" which last time I checked since this is entirely sexual falls under:

"Extreme fetish content." This includes extreme guro, scat, bestiality, vore, "hyper" fetishism (monstrously large body parts), diaper fetishism, and other extreme or unusual fetishes."
Being electrocuted, having an orgasm, blood (mild guro) and I say it once again: It looking utterly grotesque for the sake of looking the part. Call it artstyle or whatever, I dont care thats not what Im here to debate. But she is literally sitting on an electrical chair, while being electrocuted by said chair, having her brain fried at the same time, while having objects rammed into her, while having an orgasm (likely multiple as this is how these images usually go), as her ears bleed due to whats going on, while also being under immense pain. Its literally torture porn.

You wanna admit to being reactionary towards what I wrote or should I flag it again? Ill take either or to be honest cause at this point I would do it just to spite you. You tell me.

Gikame said:

📜

You can only flag a post once. If you try making another account to flag it, you will be banned.

HyphenSam said:

You can only flag a post once. If you try making another account to flag it, you will be banned.

I know, I was making a joke to be fully honest.

Gikame said:

Well Im glad you say this, want me to flag it again then for being grotesque which I already have, if you wanna act this snarky?

Even if you could, you’d just be proving your immaturity again.

Gikame said:

Considering you were the one who actually went ahead and took against the flag of the content for me "admitting my bias"? How is this actual reasoning?

Your flag was, and I quote; “Low Quality, looks grotesque for the sake of it. Applies to the rest of the artists art that isnt SFW as well”. You admitted to hating ebonyxh’s art as a reason for deleting the image. That’s pretty explicit by any metric, not to mention needing to tack on Low Quality and “looks grotesque for the sake of it” to add even a semblance of legitimacy.

Gikame said:

Especially when I wrote: "Low effort" and on top "Looks grotqesque for the sake of it".

Latter point.

Gikame said:

So am I reporting just for low effort or also for "being grotesque"

Nope. Quote above, yet again. Self-admitted bias as well, if not the entire reason.

Gikame said:

which last time I checked since this is entirely sexual falls under:

"Extreme fetish content." This includes extreme guro, scat, bestiality, vore, "hyper" fetishism (monstrously large body parts), diaper fetishism, and other extreme or unusual fetishes."

Except, it doesn’t. There’s no extreme guro, scat, bestiality, vore, “hyper” fetishism, diaper fetishism, or other extreme or unusual fetishes in sight.

Gikame said:

Being electrocuted

Which in this image is some smoke, clamps, and yellow zigzags. Clearly not extreme or unusual.

Gikame said:

having an orgasm

... did you even read what you wrote? I’d say you’re grasping at straws, but there isn’t even a straw here.

Gikame said:

blood (mild guro)

Again, you didn’t even bother to read it. “Mild”, in your own words. You have just conceded that there is no extreme guro, and that you have no argument here.

Gikame said:

and I say it once again: It looking utterly grotesque for the sake of looking the part.

Which you attribute to the rest of the artist’s NSFW work as part of your (yet again) self-admitted bias.

Gikame said:

Call it artstyle or whatever, I dont care thats not what Im here to debate.

Quite untrue, considering you rallied against the author’s entire catalogue of NSFW works, all of which aren’t this singular image, but I’ve already addressed this point.

Gikame said:

But she is literally sitting on an electrical chair, while being electrocuted by said chair, having her brain fried at the same time, while having objects rammed into her, while having an orgasm (likely multiple as this is how these images usually go), as her ears bleed due to whats going on, while also being under immense pain.

Have you ever heard about the fallacy “Misleading Vividness”? It’s taking a small number of dramatic and/or vivid events and claiming it outweighs a greater amount of statistical evidence. It’s essentially making a mountain out of a molehill in order to challenge the mountain, with a healthy dose of Appeal to Emotion by inflating the details. This is what you’re doing here, stressing out every detail in this image you find unsavoury in order to accentuate the negative as much as possible. So what if she’s having “multiple orgasms”? So what if she’s in “immense” pain, as opposed to just pain? So what if she’s being “rammed” by objects, even though this descriptor is false as the dildo inserted in her is stationary. All it is is you stretching out the details so they seem bigger than they are.

Gikame said:

Its literally torture porn.

And? I don’t see it breaking the rule posted previously.

Gikame said:

You wanna admit to being reactionary towards what I wrote or should I flag it again?

Oooooooh, resorting to Appeal to Force again! I’m shaking in me wee little booties! I might as well concede now! /s
When will YOU admit that, instead of simply blacklisting the artist you didn’t like, even after being called out for your bitching and whining, you got hotheaded and filed a false report because you couldn’t stand a jpeg you didn’t like? Probably never, but still.

Gikame said:

Ill take either or to be honest cause at this point I would do it just to spite you. You tell me.

Wow, you’re a real Internet Tough Guy™. Full of shit too, but sadly, only half as useful.

Gikame said:

I know, I was making a joke to be fully honest.

Amazing, no one’s laughing. You’re a real comedian