This post was deleted for the following reason:

Unapproved in three days after returning to moderation queue ()

It has been reviewed by 22 approvers. 1 believe it breaks the rules.

Resized to 94% of original (view original)
kuchiki rukia and inoue orihime (bleach) drawn by shexyo
  • Comments
  • Recommended
    •
    Rathurue
    [hidden]

    HyperionZero said:

    I think they realized because it's deleted on Twitter

    So should their other pics be scrutinized for possible AI uses? And since when it starts?
    Edit: few posts has suspicious details that may either be proof of AI usage or just plain lazyness of not doublechecking your work even after sketching/coloring process.

    post #9487990: non-symmetrical extra string left of Frieren's navel.
    post #9481503: bike saddle seemingly attaches to nowhere, complete with nonsensical metal connection below the seat (it was supposed to be springs). The frame of the bike didn't even connect to the front wheel (lmao) or even make sensible shape.
    post #9064147: the gold chain on Bambinetta's side connects to nowhere.
    post #9041115: the gold chain on Unohana's stomach has asymmetrical branching. The nipple cups has size/perspective dissonance (the closer it is to the viewer, the object should look bigger) but in this case the side facing away from viewer was bigger in diameter.
    post #8956488: the second row of gold necklace beads on Yoruichi's chest attaches to nothing and stops abruptly. The left side of ear chain doesn't have an earring loop. Different number of medals between left and right hip, different point of attachment of the skirt cloth.
    post #9166675: anklet on Orihime's right leg merges with the shoe/slipper. The foot on the left side has nonsensical form. Color and pattern of gems on Rukia's collar is inconsistent. Shape/color of the beads are both asymmetrical and inconsistent, too.
    post #9096961: nonsense amount of buttons on both shirt. Anomalous object on top left of the picture: if it's a chair, it's lacking the buttrest part.

    It is safe to say that most of their art appears to be AI-assisted at the least.

    Updated by Rathurue

    3 Reply
    GabrielWB
    [hidden]

    Rathurue said:

    So should their other pics be scrutinized for possible AI uses? And since when it starts?
    Edit: few posts has suspicious details that may either be proof of AI usage or just plain lazyness of not doublechecking your work even after sketching/coloring process.

    [...]

    It is safe to say that most of these appears to be AI-assisted at the least.

    I recommend posting this detailed writeup again in topic #22285.
    More people will see it, and it's easier to keep track of things as opposed to the comment section of a post that might be deleted soon.

    1 Reply