Tag implication: happy_sex --> happy

Since happy is included in happy sex by definition... (But mildly amusingly, sex isn't.)

I think both tags should be nixed, honestly.

Happy seems like a pretty silly tag, but happy_sex is at least vaguely appropriate as it provides a kind of counterpoint to... well, rape. Perhaps it could have a better name though, the name is pretty dorky. I don't know, consensual or something?

...Um, no? Consensual is not the same as happy sex at all. "Happy sex" is the term used elsewhere, anyway.

Just because it's used "elsewhere" doesn't make it less retarded as a name. The opposite is more likely to be true. Though I don't really like the idea of a consensual tag that much (too subjective-sounding), it's already miles better than happy_sex.

The name is fine. If you're suggesting consensual, you're missing the point. Posts like post #363818, post #364652, post #369180, and post #370100 (just to grab a few random) are consensual but not happy sex.

Some people like to see a little cheer. Leave alone.

The point is that the tags are stupid.

I don't necessarily think either needs canned, but both should be carefully applied. Those tags should only be used where it is unambiguous (huge happy grin, for example). The alias is a bad idea though, since the meaning of happy_sex is somewhat specialized. An alias to sex would probably be a good idea though. As for a better name, I can't really think of one, consensual really is a different idea than what is meant to be captured.

Implication rejected.