kittey said:
Child yes, parent is currently rated safe. I’d rate it questionable for cameltoe and covered nipples, but I know others wouldn’t.
It depends on how prominent they are, here I would say it's prominent enough for a Q.
Posted under General
yelite said:
Gonna say no. She is short but not loli.
post #2879504
Shota? They are smaller than the girl but those testicles dosnt look like child testicles to me.
post #3138013
I tagged it just in case
DreamFromTheLayer said:
post #3138013
I tagged it just in case
I’d say yes.
loli/rating check. These have recently been changed to safe loli.
post #35166
post #35812 - Also sexually_suggestive?
post #37928
post #38534
kittey said:
loli/rating check. These have recently been changed to safe loli.
post #35166
post #35812 - Also sexually_suggestive?
post #37928
post #38534
Ah, my mistake. Didnt notice the loli tag. I can see an argument for the imouto post but the rest are clearly safe. Anyone else have anny input?
ion288 said:
post #16631 and post #21794?
First is loli, second I'm unsure about.
90sAnimeFan said:
Doesn't seem all that suggestive or sexual; no loli.
A little over a hundred pages worth of images, quite a few having exposed nipples, have been explicitly categorized as non-sexual, i.e pool #1536.
bucolic said:
A little over a hundred pages worth of images, quite a few having exposed nipples, have been explicitly categorized as non-sexual, i.e pool #1536.
There are 204 posts in that pool tagged loli. So close to ten percent. pool #1536 is for nudity in non-sexual situations. Weather
a naked child acts in a sexual way matters little for the loli/shota tag. Though there are plenty examples of child rating:q that probably should have the tag.
tapnek said:
You want to label all of them with the Loli/Shota tag?
Not sure I understand what you mean here. No one has suggested tagging adult people loli/shota.
---
post #1438573
Currently tagged child while identical parent is tagged loli.