Posted under General
World_Funeral said:
Check out ngalima's latest uploads here. I saw sudden improvements on the artstyle. Is it safe to assume most of recent works being AI-assisted? Because the last two deleted uploads are so horrible. The user is too lazy to properly source and tag their uploads.
They're just photos with some AI filter applied.
VR-Man said:
Artist's other posts here were tagged with ai-generated.
Hair is warping all over the place. Definitely AI. For some reason, this user seems to be repeatedly ignoring bans on AI Hololive fanart while not bothering to clean up AI artifacts.
This user's posts all have the usual trappings of AI arts.
post #6059836 - what a pity, slowly but surely this site is turning into "redraw hand" collection
Updated
Marlor said:
post #6059836 - what a pity, slowly but surely this site is turning into "redraw hand" collection
Very similar to the artist's older works (e.g. post #5486235) with lighting improvements. The artist also confirmed that they use AI for backgrounds only and fully redraw the characters, meaning that it wouldn't be applicable on this background-less image.
I just upped post #6066448 but am having some doubts now especially looking through the other art on their twitter. I'm leaning more toward ai-assisted unless ai can draw feet really well now.
Any signs that it was generated by ai? There are no artifacts on the hands, sharp detailed background, a lot of details: geometrically right bowtie, table, choco. Hair is little bit messed up, maybe it's ai-assisted, but how to understand that it was completely ai-generated?
Other art by the same artist:
https://twitter.com/wanwan_majin/status/1624348769729773568
https://twitter.com/wanwan_majin/status/1624711157440184320
https://twitter.com/wanwan_majin/status/1624725250142523394
https://twitter.com/wanwan_majin/status/1624967597216366597
And if it's ai-assisted can I upload these pictures?
Updated
Oniii-chan said:
Any signs that it was generated by ai? There are no artifacts on the hands, sharp detailed background, a lot of details: geometrically right bowtie, table, choco. Hair is little bit messed up, maybe it's ai-assisted, but how to understand that it was completely ai-generated?
Other art by the same artist:
https://twitter.com/wanwan_majin/status/1624348769729773568
https://twitter.com/wanwan_majin/status/1624711157440184320
https://twitter.com/wanwan_majin/status/1624725250142523394
https://twitter.com/wanwan_majin/status/1624967597216366597And if it's ai-assisted can I upload these them?
I might have acted too hastily on that one, but I saw the odd hair as well as the reflection in the water with no source to it and reckoned that it is purely AI.
Wondering about one of my uploads: post #6073264. Didn't see anything fishy in the metadata.
Updated
post #6070757 - need tag "human-assisted".
LionPride35 said:
Wondering about one of my uploads: post #6073264. Didn't see anything fishy in the metadata.
Not seeing any clear red flags in this image.
Marlor said:
post #6070757 - need tag "human-assisted".
Very likely to be AI-assisted due to the background, but the insistence by some that this is a "lazy" photoshop is wrong. This is completely painted over in the same style as the artist's non-AI works (e.g. post #5161558).
Very likely to be AI-assisted due to the background, but the insistence by some that this is a "lazy" photoshop is wrong. This is completely painted over in the same style as the artist's non-AI works (e.g. post #5161558).
It's not my flag but I totally agree that it's 100% AI with low % of "human-assistant". The problem is that it would never be uploaded and approved here if it wasn't posted by someone without 10+years' background. What a shame.
P.S. your example has almost nothing to do with his latest AI "arts".
Updated
Are there any signs that post #6074582 and its children are from AI? The artist, torisan has not given any indication they use any tools to generate or assist their work.
InfiniteZenith said:
Are there any signs that post #6074582 and its children are from AI? The artist, torisan has not given any indication they use any tools to generate or assist their work.
Seems like the bad hand against the wall is being cited as the reason, but the artist has drawn numerous weird-looking hands (also frequently including the prominent fingernails seen here). Not enough evidence to call it AI.
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts?tags=kagami_art&z=1 - all the "asrtist"'s "work" are AI, sometimes with cringy upscale and some lines above it. It's a shame that some posts have already been reapproved and lmao if it still counts like "AI-assisted" if AI do 99.9%.
Updated
Marlor said:
https://danbooru.donmai.us/posts?tags=kagami_art&z=1 - all the "asrtist"'s "work" are AI, sometimes with cringy upscale and some lines above it. It's a shame that some posts have already been reapproved and lmao if it still counts like "AI-assisted" if AI do 99.9%.
The artist has definitely started incorporating AI, as evidenced by the artifacts in the backgrounds of post #6081802 and post #6084559, as well as the overt NovelAI style on post #6081818 that has nothing to do with their other works. Also their Twitter profile, which has begun connecting with AI artists pretty openly. Their profile has a couple images that appear entirely hand-drawn (but are slightly below borderline in quality), a number of AI pieces that are too blatantly low-quality to be posted, and a few AI redraws of decent-ish quality that comprise the few posts uploaded here.
Pointing out that these pieces are AI-assisted will correctly lead approvers to hold them to a higher standard, as is the case with a lot of borderline content. If you want to argue that certain types of AI-assisted content should be banned outright, though, that's a subject for a new thread.
feline_lump said:
The artist has definitely started incorporating AI, as evidenced by the artifacts in the backgrounds of post #6081802 and post #6084559, as well as the overt NovelAI style on post #6081818 that has nothing to do with their other works. Also their Twitter profile, which has begun connecting with AI artists pretty openly. Their profile has a couple images that appear entirely hand-drawn (but are slightly below borderline in quality), a number of AI pieces that are too blatantly low-quality to be posted, and a few AI redraws of decent-ish quality that comprise the few posts uploaded here.
Pointing out that these pieces are AI-assisted will correctly lead approvers to hold them to a higher standard, as is the case with a lot of borderline content. If you want to argue that certain types of AI-assisted content should be banned outright, though, that's a subject for a new thread.
This thread called "AI-generated art check thread" - I pointed on AI, if approvers think that upscaling and adding some lines above it is "AI-assited" (when AI did 99.9% of the work) - I can nothing to say but to admit it as a shameful act. Hoped this site will be AI free, but...
