punished_K said:
https://danbooru.donmai.us/artist_versions?search%5Bupdater_id%5D=877961
4 edits to add artists into a "Q" group that likely doesn't exist.
Very cool, but that was 8 months ago, and those aren't tags.
Posted under General
punished_K said:
https://danbooru.donmai.us/artist_versions?search%5Bupdater_id%5D=877961
4 edits to add artists into a "Q" group that likely doesn't exist.
Very cool, but that was 8 months ago, and those aren't tags.
user #757667 has been edit warring on post #7046845 since January.
user #898841 keeps deleting nazi and ss_insignia tags on post #7281077 and post #7281094, while there are visible SS insignia (Sieg runes) and SS captain rank insignia on jacket collar.
Updated by nonamethanks
sycer13 said:
user #898841 keeps deleting nazi and ss_insignia tags on post #7281077 and post #7281094, while there are visible SS insigna (Sieg runes) and SS captain rank insignia on jacket collar.
(forum #256612 )not the first time, he mentioned in this forum too
LionKuma said:
(forum #256612 )not the first time, he mentioned in this forum too
Unless that incident is related to this one, it's not necessary to bring it up.
user #606117 "forgets" the "tag what you see, not what you know" rule.
feftak said:
user #606117 "forgets" the "tag what you see, not what you know" rule.
Not sure on the others but the Utau boy is 100% a male with breasts and the wiki itself says so. He is consistently tagged 1boy even when the breasts are front and center.
feftak said:
user #606117 "forgets" the "tag what you see, not what you know" rule.
The context of several of these is clearly available in the comments or wiki pages. This amount of tag warring instead of asking for classification on why many reputable users are tagging these posts the way they are is ridiculous.
zetsubousensei said:
Not sure on the others but the Utau boy is 100% a male with breasts and the wiki itself says so. He is consistently tagged 1boy even when the breasts are front and center.
This character bears no resemblance to a male in these posts but if you say so…
gfz said:
The context of several of these is clearly available in the comments or wiki pages. This amount of tag warring instead of asking for classification on why many reputable users are tagging these posts the way they are is ridiculous.
post #5794278 this is a girl
post #6877749 this is a genderswap
male with breasts really is a disaster of tag lmao
no fuckin way post #5794278 is a boy any more than post #4607797
thelieutenant said:
male with breasts really is a disaster of tag lmao
no fuckin way post #5794278 is a boy any more than post #4607797
It is and I'd prefer 1girl as well, but thats an argument for another time. With current tagging practice if they are canonically physically male sans the breasts they get the tag.